On Dec 27, 2009, at 5:52 PM, NoiseEHC wrote:
>
>> Does Android not host its development tools because it doesn't run
>> the
>> X Window System? Since X already runs on most of the hardware that
>> Android does, that wouldn't be too hard to remedy -- and would
>> benefit
>> the whole Android
Sorry, that's "rpm -U" not "rpm -u".
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Dec 11, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:If you are going to try out OS10 for the XO-1 here are a few things that need testing.I have a G1G1 XO-1. I upgraded my firmware to q2e41, then used the nand-flash method to install OS10. (Earlier attempts were not so fruitful, but I eventually
> Does Android not host its development tools because it doesn't run the
> X Window System? Since X already runs on most of the hardware that
> Android does, that wouldn't be too hard to remedy -- and would benefit
> the whole Android community.
>
Actually, no. The .class -> .dex compiler cons
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37:10AM -0200, Cecilia Abalde wrote:
> I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh but there is a problem
> with
> the files:
> file / etc / NetworkManager / dispatcher.d / mpp.py from install of
> NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.i386 conflicts with file from package
> Does the XO-1 host its own development tools?
For all practical purposes, it does not.
First, as you have noted, it takes quite a bit of bandwidth to install the
toolchain and development headers. (And you have to know what they're called.)
Second, to get anything done with C, you really nee
> I would argue that an operating system that doesn't
> natively host its development tools is not appropriate for OLPC's
> target audience.
Does the XO-1 host its own development tools? I don't think anyone
has ever rebuilt the system from source code on an XO-1. I don't even
know a
We don't sell them, but I can send you a couple.
Please send a mailing address.
Cheers,
wad
On Dec 26, 2009, at 11:29 AM, vbx dev wrote:
> OLPC XO-1 uses the Marvell 88W8388 USB wireless adapter. I want to
> contribute to the development of the libertas/libertas-tf driver for
> this wireless ad
>
> Actually, I would argue that an operating system that doesn't
> natively host its development tools is not appropriate for OLPC's
> target audience.
>
Self hosting is not an absolute requirement. You just have traded an
existing, usable developer environment (like Eclipse) for the
possibilit
