Re: Android, OLPC, and native hosting

2009-12-27 Thread John Watlington
On Dec 27, 2009, at 5:52 PM, NoiseEHC wrote: > >> Does Android not host its development tools because it doesn't run >> the >> X Window System? Since X already runs on most of the hardware that >> Android does, that wouldn't be too hard to remedy -- and would >> benefit >> the whole Android

Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-27 Thread James Cameron
Sorry, that's "rpm -U" not "rpm -u". -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: [Testing] Some testing notes for OS10 for the XO-1

2009-12-27 Thread Bill Coderre
On Dec 11, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:If you are going to try out OS10 for the XO-1 here are a few things that need testing.I have a G1G1 XO-1. I upgraded my firmware to q2e41, then used the nand-flash method to install OS10. (Earlier attempts were not so fruitful, but I eventually

Re: Android, OLPC, and native hosting

2009-12-27 Thread NoiseEHC
> Does Android not host its development tools because it doesn't run the > X Window System? Since X already runs on most of the hardware that > Android does, that wouldn't be too hard to remedy -- and would benefit > the whole Android community. > Actually, no. The .class -> .dex compiler cons

Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-27 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37:10AM -0200, Cecilia Abalde wrote: > I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh but there is a problem > with > the files: > file / etc / NetworkManager / dispatcher.d / mpp.py from install of > NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.i386 conflicts with file from package

Re: Android, OLPC, and native hosting

2009-12-27 Thread Michael Stone
> Does the XO-1 host its own development tools? For all practical purposes, it does not. First, as you have noted, it takes quite a bit of bandwidth to install the toolchain and development headers. (And you have to know what they're called.) Second, to get anything done with C, you really nee

Re: Android, OLPC, and native hosting

2009-12-27 Thread John Gilmore
> I would argue that an operating system that doesn't > natively host its development tools is not appropriate for OLPC's > target audience. Does the XO-1 host its own development tools? I don't think anyone has ever rebuilt the system from source code on an XO-1. I don't even know a

Re: Marvell 88W8388 USB Development Dongles

2009-12-27 Thread John Watlington
We don't sell them, but I can send you a couple. Please send a mailing address. Cheers, wad On Dec 26, 2009, at 11:29 AM, vbx dev wrote: > OLPC XO-1 uses the Marvell 88W8388 USB wireless adapter. I want to > contribute to the development of the libertas/libertas-tf driver for > this wireless ad

Re: XO-3 super-o-fficial

2009-12-27 Thread NoiseEHC
> > Actually, I would argue that an operating system that doesn't > natively host its development tools is not appropriate for OLPC's > target audience. > Self hosting is not an absolute requirement. You just have traded an existing, usable developer environment (like Eclipse) for the possibilit