Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 112

2010-03-12 Thread Daniel Drake
On 12 March 2010 16:13, Martin Langhoff wrote: > I am somewhat intrigued by the behaviour I see around > http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10058 -- one of the (subjective) > impressions I have is that if the download is steady, there is no > problem. It keeps waking up for tiny amounts of time. Last t

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs GSoC 2010 Application In

2010-03-12 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, >> Sugar Labs application for Google Summer of Code 2010 has been >> accepted. > Wow, that was quick. Many congrats and thanks! Oops -- I assumed this meant that the application had been reviewed and SL is accepted into GSOC, whereas the intended meaning was just that the applicati

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Labs GSoC 2010 Application In

2010-03-12 Thread Walter Bender
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Tim, > >   > Sugar Labs application for Google Summer of Code 2010 has been >   > accepted. > > Wow, that was quick.  Many congrats and thanks! > >   > I'm not sure exactly on the politics of the situation, but my >   > personal feeling is th

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs GSoC 2010 Application In

2010-03-12 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Tim, > Sugar Labs application for Google Summer of Code 2010 has been > accepted. Wow, that was quick. Many congrats and thanks! > I'm not sure exactly on the politics of the situation, but my > personal feeling is that we should be quite encouraging of > supporting OLPC proje

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 112

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Fox
martin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Paul Fox wrote: > > note to others: mikus is describing non-default behavior. the > > default behavior is for the CPU to suspend after about 15 seconds > > of inactivity. > > And I assume powerd should play nice with the wol settings? in t

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 112

2010-03-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Paul Fox wrote: > note to others:  mikus is describing non-default behavior.  the > default behavior is for the CPU to suspend after about 15 seconds > of inactivity. And I assume powerd should play nice with the wol settings? I am somewhat intrigued by the behav

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 112

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Fox
mikus wrote: > > please report your experiences with powerd on XO-1.5 > > I've been using powerd all along on the XO-1 on those builds where it > was available. Powerd allows me to set the timeouts the way I like them > -- MUCH longer than the ones in ohm's default. Cannot say that any > "

What's the status of F11 on XO-1?

2010-03-12 Thread Hal Murray
Last I knew, returning from suspend on an XO-1 running F11 left the keyboard/mouse broken. Is anybody working on that? What can I do to help? -- > please report your experiences with powerd on XO-1.5 I've been happy with it on XO-1. I just added a whole bunch of 0s so it never susp

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 112

2010-03-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
> please report your experiences with powerd on XO-1.5 I've been using powerd all along on the XO-1 on those builds where it was available. Powerd allows me to set the timeouts the way I like them -- MUCH longer than the ones in ohm's default. Cannot say that any "negatives" have disturbed me.

Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 112

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Fox
chris wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 > http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os112 > > Compressed image size: 678.89mb (+0.16mb since build 111) > > Description of changes in this build: > * Switch from ohmd to powerd needless to say, this switch is a big change. please report

IN 1 HR: OLPC/Sugar Contributors Program Mtg (#olpc-meeting, 2PM Boston Time, Friday)

2010-03-12 Thread Holt
Please all join us right now reviewing the latest OLPC/Sugar community projects over IRC Live Chat: http://forum.laptop.org/chat Then type at bottom: /join #olpc-meeting AGENDA: * XO-1.5 early production machines now available & shipping: http://blog.laptop.org/2010/02/25/xo-1-5-early-produ

Re: XO-1.5 keyboard

2010-03-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:54 AM, John Watlington wrote: > Hmm.   I need to communicate more. > There have been a number of changes in the XO-1 keyboard > since production started. IME, the changes are quite subtle for those who aren't "in the know" -- except for the non-membrane one ;-) For exa

Re: Testing azerty in the updated xkeyboard-config - what's the right KA tag?

2010-03-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Seems to work -- now dealing with the ofw cli is more confusing that usual ;-) Installed os802b3 from http://dev.laptop.org/~martin/8.2.2-betas/ and it works a charm. Thanks for the RPM! The deadkeys work and seem to make sense. I am not

Re: sounds cut off after screen standby

2010-03-12 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 12.03.2010, at 16:37, Thomas PLESSIS wrote: > On a flash apps running with adobe air, sound is cut off after screen > standby. Any idea why this is do that? The kernel does not properly resume audio. Known, really old bug (#6201). - Bert - ___ Dev

Re: Testing azerty in the updated xkeyboard-config - what's the right KA tag?

2010-03-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > For the KA part, from http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/ofw-ka-files, > put setka.fth and azerty.ka in a USB stick, put the USB stick in the > XO, and from OFW, issue the command > fload setka.fth azerty Thanks! The setka.fth script di

sounds cut off after screen standby

2010-03-12 Thread Thomas PLESSIS
On a flash apps running with adobe air, sound is cut off after screen standby. Any idea why this is do that? Thomas Plessis ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: q3a35 problem

2010-03-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
>> Again - please tell me WHAT MORE a user performing a firmware reflash >> can do "to ensure that the firmware reflash actually occurred" ? > > On reboot press the x key (esc) to get to open firmware and check the > ofw banner at the top of the screen. My normal practice is to press the 'check'

Re: q3a35 problem

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Fox
reuben k caron wrote: > > > On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:52 AM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > > > > > You also said "If the firmware update wasn't happening (say, due to no > > DC input)". But what I posted to you in this thread was: "What I do > > is > > to wait while 'flash u:\q3a35.rom' ste

Re: q3a35 problem

2010-03-12 Thread Reuben K Caron
On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:52 AM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: You have to ensure that the firmware reflash actually occurred properly before continuing. >>> >>> ... >>> I believe the above actions are the "normal" ones to perform a >>> firmware >>> reflash. When you say "you have to