I've changed the Content-Type returned by dev.laptop.org and
build.laptop.org and other virtual hosts for a few file types:
application/octet-stream for .zd .zsp .lzma .toc .iso and .rom
text/plain for .md5
I'm not aware of any likely side-effects, but let me know if you find
any.
--
James Cam
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:27 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9350 (xrandr screen rotation support) is
> still being worked. We did try with software frame buffer rotation
> enabled, but it did not perform well.
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>
Chris,
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9350 (xrandr screen rotation support) is
still being worked. We did try with software frame buffer rotation
enabled, but it did not perform well.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@list
Hi,
> I updated my XO-1.5s to 119 yesterday and was surprised to see
> that the screen rotation button still doesn't seem to
> work. Looking through the mailing-lists I didn't find any
> discussion about this topic which kinda surprised me.
The openchrome driver hasn't previously had
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
> http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os119
>
> Compressed image size: 678.36mb (+0.01mb since build 118)
>
> Description of changes in this build:
> * kernel: allow negotiation of 5/10/15/30fps (#10106)
>
> W
Hi!
Did anyone get libertas_tf on XO-1 working with recent kernels (from git
branch olpc-2.6.31-updates)?
For me it refuses to work at all in managed and ibss modes. In monitor
mode, it causes sshd and "ip link set wlan1 up" resp. "ifconfig wlan1
up" to hang when executing one of the latter.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:32 PM, sonubi seun wrote:
> I just got 2 know about the "X-O"and its activities, and i'm rily interested
> in creating an activity that will help these young kids to get more creative
> and innovativeI just wanna ask..where do i start from?...learn python or
> what?.
> exist some study for adobe FLASH on sugar 0.82 and XO 1.0 ?
> requirements? considerations to develop activities?
Hola Esteban!
Check out the Wiki entry we started here on Flash Edu-game dev for the XO:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Projects/Flash_Gamedev
We'll be updating the wiki soon.
-Naz
--
I just got 2 know about the "X-O"and its activities, and i'm rily interested in
creating an activity that will help these young kids to get more creative and
innovativeI just wanna ask..where do i start from?...learn python or
what?...i'm a bit conversant with php, java, C++ and visual basic
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:59, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
wrote:
> Hi Esteban
>
> Take a look at the eatboom activity, it's an sketch to develop
> activities based on .swf files, thanks to the work of tomeu and
> wadeb.
>
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4225
>
>
> i use it
Hi Esteban
Take a look at the eatboom activity, it's an sketch to develop
activities based on .swf files, thanks to the work of tomeu and
wadeb.
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4225
i use it to make
http://people.sugarlabs.org/rafael/CuerpoHumano-1.xo
hth.
Rafael Ortiz
Hi,
exist some study for adobe FLASH on sugar 0.82 and XO 1.0 ?
requirements? considerations to develop activities?
thanks
Esteban.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Carlos,
This was posted to the wrong list. Please post
questions about constructivist learning to IEAP
where people
who study education can provide a real answer.
wad
On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> Questions:
>
> A) Syntax vs. Algorithms
>
> Scenario 1:
> complex
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 19:13, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> That's because of the exim. Do a 'yum install ssmtp' then a 'yum
>> remove exim' and most of that problem goes away. the auto depsolving
>> for '/usr/bin/sendmail' get exim by default because i
On 12 April 2010 19:13, Peter Robinson wrote:
> That's because of the exim. Do a 'yum install ssmtp' then a 'yum
> remove exim' and most of that problem goes away. the auto depsolving
> for '/usr/bin/sendmail' get exim by default because its the shortest
> name and comes first. exim depends on per
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Stanley Sokolow
wrote:
> maybe getting FlashPlayer to
> run correctly on Sugar is a non-issue by now
I think it Just Works, but if there are technical issues we will be
interested in hearing about them and exploring solutions. Let us know
how it goes, file bugs a
> We're not demanding anyone is giving away anything for free. We simply
> choose to do that ourselves, and we want to enable others to do the same, so
> we make available everything someone else might need to build on our work.
> But nobody is forcing you to do as we do, so don't whine.
I'm fine
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:38:40AM +0800, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
I know a lot of us would rather date the less attractive girl over the
dumb blonde, but are you guys saying the smart blonde is less hawt?
(go Natalie Portman!)
OK, you're definitely starting to offend people. Please stop it.
Actu
On 13/04/2010 10:42, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> El Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:06:04 +0800
> Carlos Nazareno escribió:
>> Some developers need to put food on the table and feed themselves and
>> their family.
>> Do you think that's evil?
>
> As long as they distribute their software as free software, it's a g
On 13.04.2010, at 11:06, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
>
> I'm sorry if I offended you guys
At this point you're not even offensive anymore, just pitiable.
We're not demanding anyone is giving away anything for free. We simply choose
to do that ourselves, and we want to enable others to do the same, s
El Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:06:04 +0800
Carlos Nazareno escribió:
> Some developers need to put food on the table and feed themselves and
> their family.
> Do you think that's evil?
As long as they distribute their software as free software, it's a good
thing. Distributing non-free software is evil.
"How could you justify to not include source code?
That's evil. As evil as suggesting the use of a platform that children
would be unable to use if they wished to."
--
I'm really sorry for cluttering the list again, but I had to
immediately reply to this.
Some developers need to put food on t
Hi, Martin,
Thanks for your reply. When you said to "just install Flash", your brevity
actually was helpful. It made me think that maybe getting FlashPlayer to
run correctly on Sugar is a non-issue by now. I plan to retry the Flash and
browser downloads from the wiki. They seem to have been i
El Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:40:27 +0800
Carlos Nazareno escribió:
>
> Which of the 2 scenarios is constructionist?
>
How could you justify to not include source code?
That's evil. As evil as suggesting the use of a platform that children
would be unable to use if they wished to.
Even good document
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 23:54 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Bernie, I'm not sure the point of this point at this point in time. To
>> copy and paste part of the response I did to the other thread on
>> fedora-olpc for others benefit.
>>
>>
25 matches
Mail list logo
