On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:38:37AM -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> But this was on channel 1. Can neighbors (or drive-bys) connect to
> it?
Yes. Depending on what you mean by "connect".
Anyone else in the vicinity [1] can obtain the laptop name [2] merely by
performing a passive scan [3].
Anyo
I've reproduced "no sharing" over mesh on os240py.
Activity sharing works via access point.
Activity sharing works via "Create new wireless network" aka ad-hoc.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Tim McNamara
wrote:
> On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti
>> wrote:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
>> > for the XO-1. Our foc
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:26:41AM -0700, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote:
> I just noticed that the http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 page
> has not been updated with information about and pointing to the OS13
> build.
I've updated it. There's an OS14 available from April as well, but I've
not f
I just connected wirelessly
1- ) Mirabelle USB
Started Chat as shared in Mirabelle
2- )Blueberry.vmx
Joined
3- ) XO-1 os230py (Sugar 0.88.0)
Joined
XO-1 saw all connections colors and text
Blueberry saw 1/2 of connections with color balance were plus text
Mirabelle saw only its own broad
CentOS ?
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Tim McNamara
wrote:
> On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti
>> wrote:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
>> > for the XO-1.
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti
> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
> > for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for deployments,
> > although we're
2010/5/30 Bernie Innocenti :
> El Wed, 12-05-2010 a las 16:49 -0400, Fernando Luis González Arriola
> escribió:
>> Hoy, con el esfuerzo de todo el TEAM, pudimos lograr hacer (o mejor
>> dicho adaptar) un mega cargador, que se puede utilizar tranquilamente
>> hasta con 9 equipos a la vez (quizás más
El Wed, 12-05-2010 a las 16:49 -0400, Fernando Luis González Arriola
escribió:
> Hoy, con el esfuerzo de todo el TEAM, pudimos lograr hacer (o mejor
> dicho adaptar) un mega cargador, que se puede utilizar tranquilamente
> hasta con 9 equipos a la vez (quizás más), aquí van las fotos.
Fernando, it
Excerpts from Paul Fox's message of Sun May 30 14:01:08 + 2010:
> is this the same patch you sent earlier? i have the older
> version queued up in my tree for testing before commiting to the
> olpc main branch.
I've sent exactly the same patch first to libertas-dev+olpc-devel and
later to linu
is this the same patch you sent earlier? i have the older
version queued up in my tree for testing before commiting to the
olpc main branch.
paul
sascha wrote:
> This patch fixes the libertas driver incorrectly reporting that Wake-on-LAN
> is not supported if Wake-on-LAN is currently disabled.
Excerpts from Mikus Grinbergs's message of Sun May 30 09:38:37 + 2010:
> I've been currently using an Ad-Hoc wireless network (set up by clicking
> in an XO's palette at the gray icon in Frame) for testing collaboration.
> That network is performing well, and has been reliable.
Great!
> But
OFF TOPIC
I've been currently using an Ad-Hoc wireless network (set up by clicking
in an XO's palette at the gray icon in Frame) for testing collaboration.
That network is performing well, and has been reliable.
But this was on channel 1. Can neighbors (or drive-bys) connect to it?
And what is
13 matches
Mail list logo
