Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] Attention Activity Developers: SoaS Activity Inclusion Criteria

2010-06-08 Thread Carlo Falciola
--- Mar 8/6/10, Sameer Verma ha scritto: > Da: Sameer Verma > Oggetto: Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] Attention Activity Developers: SoaS Activity > Inclusion Criteria > A: "Sebastian Dziallas" > Cc: "Devel" , "iaep" , > "Sugar devel" , "Sugar on a Stick List" > > Data: Martedì 8 giugno 2010, 07:29 >

Audio/sensor input on XO-1 (was: Re: schematic for olpc)

2010-06-08 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Michael Shiloh's message of Tue Jun 08 04:59:43 + 2010: > Do you know the state of the Measure project? Their goals seem very > close to mine. I've been working to fix the most important issues, but the code is obscure, undocumented and not well-understood by the people currentl

Re: multi-touch

2010-06-08 Thread Carlos Nazareno
can't wait for this enough to happen. Is it possible for this to arrive in the XO 1.75? Hope it's done a la Notion Ink Adam w/ a Pixel Qi multitouch screen :) Tablet mode on the XO just screamed for a touch interface. First instinct when using it is to try to see if touchscreen worked :) it gets

Re: multi-touch

2010-06-08 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Carlos Nazareno wrote: > If possible, go for a minimum of 5 touch points capability, which is > what Apple has I think. Apple actually supports 11 on the iPad. Palm and the iPhone support 5. http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/05/10/gemmell-multitouch --sco

Re: schematic for olpc

2010-06-08 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Michael Shiloh wrote: > > > On 06/07/2010 06:46 AM, imm wrote: >> >> On 6 Jun 2010, at 21:42, Michael Shiloh wrote: >> >>> I'm interested in exploring the use of the microphone jack for other >>> input devices. >>> >>> Before I start plugging things in at random, I

Re: Alternative option for solving Fedora i686 vs geode problems

2010-06-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:31 AM, John Gilmore wrote: >> 2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the >> issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed >> upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in >> F-12 that the Geode LX would be

Re: Touchscreen requirements

2010-06-08 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 08.06.2010, at 07:44, John Watlington wrote: > OLPC is looking to add multi-touch to our interface over > the next year --- it is certainly necessary for a tablet. > But "multi-touch" describes a huge range of parameters. > Before taking a first pass at a spec. document, I'd like to > stir up s

Re: schematic for olpc

2010-06-08 Thread Richard A. Smith
On 06/08/2010 01:04 AM, Michael Shiloh wrote: >> The schematics are not public. If you can't find enough info on the >> Measure pages from the other response then ask and we can provide it >> for you. > > Thank you Richard. > > It looks like there is plenty of material on the Measure page. I will

Re: Touchscreen requirements

2010-06-08 Thread John Watlington
On Jun 8, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > Thanks for inviting discussion! > > I recently started testing Etoys on the Apple iPad - not the least to get an > idea of what needs to be done to it for an XO tablet. Multi-touch is > definitely "cool", e.g. you can move around multiple E

Re: multi-touch

2010-06-08 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, > Does anyone know how many inputs Android can recognize if that's > where XO-3 is going? (and possibly XO-1.75 if it's going to be an > ARM architecture) Bit of confusion here: OLPC isn't going to ship Android on XO-1.75 or XO-3. Marvell (or another partner) will use Android for s

Re: Touchscreen requirements

2010-06-08 Thread imm
>> I'd rather keep tracking the first touches and ignore additional >> ones. Then accidental touches wouldn't interrupt the current >> interaction. > > Interesting point. On an experimental multi-touch "kiosk" we were working on (and which came to nothing in the end), we found that it was p

Re: multitouch

2010-06-08 Thread Carlos Nazareno
a) Ratio - 4:3 -> is it possible to use a more normal/accepted resolution that actual monitors use so that in the future, if emulation works well on PCs, developers w/o XO machines can design their apps/GUI better? Like say 1280x960 or 1280x800 (WXGA) instead of 1200x900? That's not so big a diffe

Re: multitouch

2010-06-08 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 08.06.2010, at 17:46, Carlos Nazareno wrote: > a) Ratio - 4:3 -> is it possible to use a more normal/accepted > resolution that actual monitors use so that in the future, if > emulation works well on PCs, developers w/o XO machines can design > their apps/GUI better? It's not that hard to get

using libertas_tf with F11 on XO-1

2010-06-08 Thread Assim Deodia
Hi, I am trying to load libertas_tf_usb module on XO-1 to use it as an AP. but when I modprobe libertas_tf_usb (after unloading libertas and usb8xxx ) eth0 disappears and wmaster0 appears. Googling wmaster0 shows that its a hidden interface which sometime shows up and is use for internal purpose.

Re: Touchscreen requirements

2010-06-08 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:23 AM, John Watlington wrote: > An interesting effect I've noticed is that with some touchscreen, you get > smooth > lines when moving your finger at a "normal speed", say 8 cm/s, but when you > slow > down (1 cm/s) the line wiggles around. See http://labs.moto.com/robo

F13 glibc with nopl instructions - an explanation

2010-06-08 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, In the FESCO meeting today (http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-06-08/fesco.2010-06-08-19.30.log.txt), Fedora developers and some members of the OLPC community discussed the loss of Geode LX (i.e. XO-1) support in F13. It looks like we are all in agreement that the loss of su

Re: Touchscreen requirements

2010-06-08 Thread John Watlington
On Jun 8, 2010, at 2:28 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:23 AM, John Watlington wrote: >> An interesting effect I've noticed is that with some touchscreen, you get >> smooth >> lines when moving your finger at a "normal speed", say 8 cm/s, but when you >> slow >> down (1

Re: Touchscreen requirements

2010-06-08 Thread Jon Nettleton
> > Time to find a small finger for testing demos... > wad > Those mini cocktail wieners should work. With the added bonus you can eat the testing fingers when you are hunger :-) Jon ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org

Re: Touchscreen requirements

2010-06-08 Thread John Watlington
The mini cocktail wieners I'm familiar with are still around 8-10mm. I guess I could carve one down and wrap it in plastic... On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:07 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote: >> >> Time to find a small finger for testing demos... >> wad >> > > Those mini cocktail wieners should work. With

Re: Touchscreen requirements

2010-06-08 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:14 PM, John Watlington wrote: > > The mini cocktail wieners I'm familiar with are still > around 8-10mm.   I guess I could carve one down > and wrap it in plastic... Gummy fingers are more fun: http://cryptome.info/0001/gummy/gummy.htm --scott --

Re: Touchscreen requirements

2010-06-08 Thread John Watlington
On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:27 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:14 PM, John Watlington wrote: >> >> The mini cocktail wieners I'm familiar with are still >> around 8-10mm. I guess I could carve one down >> and wrap it in plastic... > > Gummy fingers are more fun: http://cryp