On 06/01/2010 03:32 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 1 June 2010 02:55, Sascha Silbe
> wrote:
>> Excerpts from James Cameron's message of Tue Jun 01 00:42:38 + 2010:
>>> Yep, that's it. Sugar is entirely relying on the existence of this
>>> multicast route, and it is not present on os240py.
>>>
Sridhar -
There are a few things happening at once here, and we should distinguish
between the general case (what's been enabled in the design) and one particular
instance of that case (machines for Spanish-speaking high-school students).
From an engineering perspective, we have:
1. Redesigne
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:01:52AM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Sayamindu (and others),
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:46:43PM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
[Apologies for the cross-posting]
Thanks to the pointers provided by
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Btw, the multicast route has been added to NM, there is an rpm in
> F11-testing. Would be nice if some people test it too, so it gets
> included in the stable branch and does land in F11.
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
>
> https://admin.fedoraproj
On 06/23/2010 03:59 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Btw, the multicast route has been added to NM, there is an rpm in
>> F11-testing. Would be nice if some people test it too, so it gets
>> included in the stable branch and does land in F11.
james wrote:
> Alberto,
>
> Sugar Activities are restricted in what they can do by design. It
> would be better if you could make your Activity work within Sugar's
> restrictions.
>
> One thing that might work is to make a Journal entry out of your
> compiled code, with a suitable MIME t
FYI for the deployment groups that might have something they'd like to
be pushed or that have packages in updates-testing for F-11
-- Forwarded message --
From: Josh Boyer
Date: Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:23 PM
Subject: Final Fedora 11 Updates push 6/24
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedo
Continuing on the tradition of "Keep confusion, yet again" thread
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023440.html
I was yesterday in a conf call with the Perú team, who had been
working with teachers and were reporting a "keep" bug on F11/S0.84
images.
What was very clear wa
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:49:48PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> B1 - That we have a "Keep" button, labelled "Keep", that actually
> creates a new document but retains the same document name.
I don't like it.
> B2 - What you can see between steps #2.1 and #2.2 -- if you wait a few
> seconds bet
Hi Quozl,
you've mentioned some interesting details to our writes-to-SD-are-slow
issues. Do we have a good scripted test that is current to the problem
(as we understand it today)?
I know a few things about linux's VFS tuning, and have some ideas I'd
like to test...
cheers,
m
--
martin.lang
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 05:08:40PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> you've mentioned some interesting details to our writes-to-SD-are-slow
> issues. Do we have a good scripted test that is current to the problem
> (as we understand it today)?
My calculations were based on an invalid assumption so I
On 06/23/2010 05:08 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Hi Quozl,
>
> you've mentioned some interesting details to our writes-to-SD-are-slow
> issues. Do we have a good scripted test that is current to the problem
> (as we understand it today)?
>
> I know a few things about linux's VFS tuning, and have s
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:39 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> My calculations were based on an invalid assumption so I'll have to
> retest.
So we don't have a test that shows the problem. Drat.
Here are my notes anyway -
- Happy to see that the commit below made it into 2.6.31 and is in
our kernel.
On 23 June 2010 15:49, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Continuing on the tradition of "Keep confusion, yet again" thread
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023440.html
>
> I was yesterday in a conf call with the Perú team, who had been
> working with teachers and were reporting a
On 23 June 2010 16:08, Martin Langhoff > you've mentioned some
interesting details to our writes-to-SD-are-slow
> issues. Do we have a good scripted test that is current to the problem
> (as we understand it today)?
I wrote one, you can find it here:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9688
It replicate
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 06:07:46PM -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Here in Peru they are modifying all of the 30 activities on the laptop
> to remove the Keep button.
Those modifications will have general interest from other deployments.
Can they be published?
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.or
On 24 Jun 2010, at 00:07, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 23 June 2010 15:49, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Continuing on the tradition of "Keep confusion, yet again" thread
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023440.html
>>
>> I was yesterday in a conf call with the Perú team, wh
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://build.laptop.org/10.1.1/os204
Compressed image size: 705.29mb (-0.05mb since build 203)
New versions of squeak-vm and Scratch fix two audio bugs:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9375
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10168
Those are the last two filed blocke
18 matches
Mail list logo
