On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:47:19AM -0400, Samuel Klein wrote:
I have not! I love puppy linux. I remember a group really wanted to
be the underlying OS on the XO at the start of the project...
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:14 AM, David Farning dfarn...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you seen the recent work
Hi,
I cant disable the touchpad.
*Version 802 with fedora 9*:
*xsetpointer -c OLPC ALPS HGPK*
*Version dextrose - fedora 11*:
If I do:*
*
*xsetpointer -c OLPC ALPS HGPK*, then shows:
Extended device OLPC ALPS HGPK not found
If I do:
*xsetpointer -c OLPC HGPK ALPS HGPK* and shows error:
X Error
Try xsetspointer -l, it lists the devices connected.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Esteban Arias ear...@plan.ceibal.edu.uywrote:
Hi,
I cant disable the touchpad.
*Version 802 with fedora 9*:
*xsetpointer -c OLPC ALPS HGPK*
*Version dextrose - fedora 11*:
If I do:*
*
*xsetpointer -c
yes, xsetspointer -l lists *OLPC HGPK ALPS HGPK *device.
2010/9/9 Emiliano Pastorino epastor...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy
Try xsetspointer -l, it lists the devices connected.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Esteban Arias
ear...@plan.ceibal.edu.uywrote:
Hi,
I cant disable the touchpad.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:39:32PM +0700, Yang Ha Nguyen wrote:
Puppy Linux should be better than Ubuntu on XO since it's much more
lightweight.
Sounds like you haven't tried what I built then. I've not included
everything Ubuntu includes.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
First and foremost, your approach seems reasonable to me.
+1
As far as I know, this functionality is rarely used,
The functionality is now rarely used because olpc-update is not used as
frequently as it used to be and
On 9 September 2010 18:01, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we do it in the bg with a very low-pri process? We'd have to mark
the pristine as in process of deletion if the deletion is stopped
we continue the job next round.
It's an option, but I'm thinking that deleting the
