Re: Updating with olpc-update command

2010-09-24 Thread Jon Nettleton
>> if I understand correctly you are using Sugar on Fedora and not an OLPC >> build. The olpc-update command is meant to update olpc-images for the >> XO. For updating your configuration you need to use the distribution >> specific means. *snip* >> >> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures

Re: Updating with olpc-update command

2010-09-24 Thread Narendra Sisodiya
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 09/21/2010 04:16 PM, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > > Dear all, I have two question > > > > 1) I am using virtual environment to booting up fedora-sugar. Can I use > > olpc-update command for update purpose ? When I try the command, it giv

Re: OLPC-OS-Builder

2010-09-24 Thread Daniel Drake
On 24 September 2010 14:12, Hellânio Costa wrote: > ok, > need to install the koffice-suite on the laptop besides some applications, > you see: > I edited for convenience only "kspkglist.50.gnome.inc" You should use the custom_packages module and avoid modifying olpc-os-builder code to add new pa

Re: OLPC-OS-Builder

2010-09-24 Thread Hellânio Costa
ok, need to install the koffice-suite on the laptop besides some applications, you see: I edited for convenience only "kspkglist.50.gnome.inc" # --- OLPC / UFCeará BRAZIL # # gnome desktop gnome-python2-gconf gnome-desktop gnome-panel

Re: OLPC-OS-Builder

2010-09-24 Thread Daniel Drake
On 24 September 2010 13:01, Hellânio Costa wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm having a problem when working with them olpc-builder, because it returns > the following error: > > os19: 71283/131072 files (0.9% non-contiguous), 386289/524288 blocks >  * Running part mountfs base mountfs.50.mount.sh... >

Re: OLPC-OS-Builder

2010-09-24 Thread Esteban Bordon
Are you executing osbuilder.py using sudo? If you're using sudo olpc-os-builder have a problem when it executes chroot. You must to try using root user. cheers. 2010/9/24 Hellânio Costa > Hi everybody, > > I'm having a problem when working with them olpc-builder, because it > returns the foll

Re: OLPC-OS-Builder

2010-09-24 Thread Hellânio Costa
yes I am logged in as root Fedora 11 without updates. So I do not understand why this is giving error! : ( I may be generating a very large image and then the error? 2010/9/24 James Cameron > > I presume this would read Permission denied. -- Instituto UFC - Virtual www.virtual.ufc.br __

Re: OLPC-OS-Builder

2010-09-24 Thread James Cameron
Are you running it as root? On 24/09/2010, at 10:01 PM, Hellânio Costa wrote: > Normalize file times... > touch: configurando horário de "/var/tmp/olpc-os-builder/mnt-fs/dev/fd": > Permissão negada I presume this would read Permission denied. Are you running it on Fedora 11?

OLPC-OS-Builder

2010-09-24 Thread Hellânio Costa
Hi everybody, I'm having a problem when working with them olpc-builder, because it returns the following error: os19: 71283/131072 files (0.9% non-contiguous), 386289/524288 blocks * Running part mountfs base mountfs.50.mount.sh... Mounting intermediate filesystem image... * Running part preima

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-24 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/23/2010 03:55 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:56, Paul Fox wrote: >>> tomeu wrote: >>> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff >>> >wrote: >>> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Tomeu >>> Viz

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:12, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 09/23/2010 03:30 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:56, Paul Fox  wrote: >>> tomeu wrote: >>>   >  On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff >>>   >    wrote: >>>   >  >  On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Tomeu >>>

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-24 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/23/2010 03:30 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:56, Paul Fox wrote: >> tomeu wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff >> >wrote: >> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso >> wrote: >> > >> So the problem is that if you had to