Re: Where should I put my public_rpms for 10.1.3 ?

2010-10-21 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 20.10.2010, at 23:44, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 10/20/2010 07:10 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> as in the past, should it be ~/public_rpms/10.1.3 ? Will that work? > > Yes, using the public_rpms will work. They will end up under the name of > dsd then [1]. Mind that you ha

Edit/audit wikipedia activity

2010-10-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi list, we are getting interesting news of not-quite-good content in Wikipedia content included in the Wikipedia activities. Unfortunately, there is a clear need to organise a facility to audit/edit the wikipedia snapshots we have and "repack" the archive. Do we have any easy way to do this? Is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Edit/audit wikipedia activity

2010-10-21 Thread Tabitha Roder
On 22 October 2010 05:06, Martin Langhoff wrote: > we are getting interesting news of not-quite-good content in Wikipedia > content included in the Wikipedia activities. > > Schools wiki is quite good as it has images as well as text on 5000 pages of curriculum (British) appropriate content. This

Re: Edit/audit wikipedia activity

2010-10-21 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
On 10/21/2010 12:06 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Unfortunately, there is a clear need to organise a facility to > audit/edit the wikipedia snapshots we have and "repack" the archive. > > Do we have any easy way to do this? I'm the wrong person to answer this question, but the activity's archive p

Re: Edit/audit wikipedia activity

2010-10-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Actually editing article text is not something we have attempted AFAIK. And that's exactly what we need to do. We cannot blacklist vandalized major 'distributor' pages. We cannot grab a new import just to audit all again. m --  m