Now that we have USB2VGA adapter support, has anyone tried an XO with
an interactive whiteboard? These things are in every classroom here in
Australia.
I understand that there are different models that each work
differently, and their proprietary nature makes compatibility even
more difficult.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
srid...@laptop.org.au wrote:
Now that we have USB2VGA adapter support, has anyone tried an XO with
an interactive whiteboard? These things are in every classroom here in
Australia.
I understand that there are different models that each work
Might 1GB of RAM become a performance bottleneck?
I myself am skeptical of efforts to use the OLPC where a desktop system
might be more effective. I've run various large applications on an
XO-1.5 system, and have not myself experienced memory shortage.
Unless the RAM chips on the XO-1.75
[cc+=olpc-devel]
Hmm, it'd be interesting to see how much of a performance improvement
webkit offers.
Also, should we consider loading mobile versions of websites on the
XO-1? I don't know how good an alternative that might be.
Could be leverage the school server in some way? Any other ideas?
I think the best way to use an interactive whiteboard is to use Sugar
as a VirtualBox guest in full screen mode. I would not expect to use an
XO ... schools with interactive whiteboards tend also to have far better
laptops and computers available for teachers to use.
For learner display via
Will Flash Flash Player Java SE (not JavaME) run on the XO-1.75, it
being non-x86?
For Android, Flash Player requires an ARMv7 (Cortex) + to run.
Flash Player 9 was running on the N900 which ran Maemo.
Video calls streaming over internet is now one of the most important
uses for developing
On 14 April 2011 06:16, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Might 1GB of RAM become a performance bottleneck?
I myself am skeptical of efforts to use the OLPC where a desktop system
might be more effective. I've run various large applications on an XO-1.5
system, and have not myself
Hmm, it'd be interesting to see how much of a performance improvement
webkit offers.
It's no big deal to run webkit-based browsers on the XO. For instance,
all of my XO-1s have Midori installed.
The question is - what is this performance improvement that you are
looking for? I believe that
On 14 April 2011 06:16, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Unless the RAM chips on the XO-1.75 are socketed (and thus easily
replaceable),
This seems unlikely. Socketing adds cost up front, and low cost is a
primary goal. Also the demand for upgrade would be relatively low.
...
On 04/13/2011 05:47 PM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
Will Flash Flash Player Java SE (not JavaME) run on the XO-1.75, it
being non-x86?
You may look into trying to get Java SE For Embedded working. It
supposedly supports ARM architectures, but that's all I know about it.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Alan Eliasen elia...@mindspring.com wrote:
I considered it also a serious problem that the then-shipping
configurations of the OLPC completely lacked fonts with glyphs for many
languages (e.g. there were no fonts with Chinese or Japanese characters)
so these
11 matches
Mail list logo