Re: Sad face

2011-09-09 Thread James Cameron
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:39:47AM -0400, Richard Smith wrote: > Uruguay replaces the OLPC key with theirs. There is nothing we can > do. You must talk to Uruguay support. Ah, thanks. I'll stop thinking about it then. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ __

Re: Sad face

2011-09-09 Thread Richard Smith
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:28 AM, James Cameron wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 04:15:51AM +, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote: >> No.. the XO is with "security enabled".. >> And the "developer key" from OLPC not works on Uruguayan XO.. > > Then, without repair skills and equipment, there is no

Re: Sad face

2011-09-09 Thread James Cameron
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 04:15:51AM +, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote: > No.. the XO is with "security enabled".. > And the "developer key" from OLPC not works on Uruguayan XO.. Then, without repair skills and equipment, there is nothing further you can do. But I'm surprised the developer key

RE: Sad face

2011-09-09 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
No.. the XO is with "security enabled".. And the "developer key" from OLPC not works on Uruguayan XO.. > Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:18:41 +1000 > From: qu...@laptop.org > To: alan...@hotmail.com > CC: devel@lists.laptop.org > Subject: Re: Sad face > > Can you reach the ok prompt? > > http://wik

Re: os4 - ARM emulator/simulator? [Devel Digest, Vol 67, Issue 16]

2011-09-09 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:31:50PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > Is there an appropriate x86 emulator/simulator that would allow > testing for those without an XO-1.75? No, we're not building emulation images. Get an XO-1.75. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _

Re: os4 - ARM emulator/simulator? [Devel Digest, Vol 67, Issue 16]

2011-09-09 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
> > Congratulations! > > Is there an appropriate x86 emulator/simulator that would allow testing for > those without an XO-1.75? > Thanks > Right now, the image for xo-1.75, is practically equal to the image for xo-1.5 The differences are related to hardware support and a emulator will not help.

Re: os4 - ARM emulator/simulator? [Devel Digest, Vol 67, Issue 16]

2011-09-09 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
>    3. 11.3.0 build 4 released, for > *XO-1.75*, XO-1.5 and XO-1 >       (Daniel Drake) > -- > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:18:36 +0100 > From: Daniel Drake > To: OLPC Devel > Subject: 11.3.0 build 4 released, for *XO-1.75*, XO-1.5 and > XO-1 > Message

Re: Sad face

2011-09-09 Thread James Cameron
Can you reach the ok prompt? http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ok -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Sad face

2011-09-09 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
Hello! XO shows whether the message that the "time is incorrect" and show a sad face ... There is an easy way to fix it? I'm not have a root permissions... Regards Alan _

Re: arm-3.0 branch renamed to arm-3.0-wip - don't be scared to push!

2011-09-09 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:51 PM, James Cameron wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:55:05PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: >> We've just renamed the olpc-kernel arm-3.0 to arm-3.0-wip (Work In >> Progress). > > No worries. > > How do non-committing developers who have a clone of the repository > trackin

Re: arm-3.0 branch renamed to arm-3.0-wip - don't be scared to push!

2011-09-09 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > We've just renamed the olpc-kernel arm-3.0 to arm-3.0-wip (Work In Progress). Thanks! We have so far treated the arm-3.0 branch (and its predecessors) with a lot of... respect. Push to it as soon as it's reasonable for us to include your cod

Re: 11.3.0 build 4 released, for *XO-1.75*, XO-1.5 and XO-1

2011-09-09 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:14:12PM -0400, Kevin Gordon wrote: > I have another silly request. For those of us testing on multiple > platforms, the download file names for both the 1.75 and 1.5 image are > now the same: i.e.: os4.zd4. It would be nice to be able to > differentiate between the two,

Re: 11.3.0 build 4 released, for *XO-1.75*, XO-1.5 and XO-1

2011-09-09 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Kevin Gordon wrote: > the same:  i.e.: os4.zd4.  It would be nice to be able to differentiate Use a filesystem that supports subdirectories ;-) I have 3 download dirs - m --  martin.langh...@gmail.com  mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC  - ask intere

Re: 11.3.0 build 4 released, for *XO-1.75*, XO-1.5 and XO-1

2011-09-09 Thread Kevin Gordon
I have another silly request. For those of us testing on multiple platforms, the download file names for both the 1.75 and 1.5 image are now the same: i.e.: os4.zd4. It would be nice to be able to differentiate between the two, as in the easy way it was for uim/onu for XO-1 vs zd4/zsp for XO 1.5

Re: 11.3.0 build 4 released, for *XO-1.75*, XO-1.5 and XO-1

2011-09-09 Thread James Cameron
XO-1.75 B1 users should note the discontinuity, that the version they should test after os42, is os4. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_1.75_B1#Upgrading_Linux -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://

11.3.0 build 4 released, for *XO-1.75*, XO-1.5 and XO-1

2011-09-09 Thread Daniel Drake
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/11.3.0 http://build.laptop.org/11.3.0/os4 XO-1.75 support has been added. Woohoo! By bringing XO-1.75 into 11.3.0 and with some related efforts, loads of stuff has got fixed. Peter Robinson has full release notes, he'll post them later. This also includes Jon Nettleton's

Re: arm-3.0 branch renamed to arm-3.0-wip - don't be scared to push!

2011-09-09 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:55:05PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > We've just renamed the olpc-kernel arm-3.0 to arm-3.0-wip (Work In > Progress). No worries. How do non-committing developers who have a clone of the repository tracking the arm-3.0 branch adapt to this? -- James Cameron http://quoz

arm-3.0 branch renamed to arm-3.0-wip - don't be scared to push!

2011-09-09 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, We've just renamed the olpc-kernel arm-3.0 to arm-3.0-wip (Work In Progress). This is to help reflect the position that this branch *is* ok for experimental and in-progress work. As long as it has had minimal developer testing and is at the point where further testing should happen by the wid

Re: Command to power cycle

2011-09-09 Thread Kevin Gordon
Thanks gents, My initial attempts to use this to fix the USB2VGA2 problem failed, but both suggestions did cause the XO to go to deep sleep. Thanks again. I may have to actually wait for the XO to 'hang' on boot before trying this as a kick-start. So, I will plod on. Cheers, and if you are Pa