--- On Tue, 4/3/12, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> From: Mikus Grinbergs
> Subject: Re: 12.1.0 devel build 6 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75
> To: "Peter Robinson"
> Cc: o...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.laptop.org
> Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 1:56 AM
> I've already written a
Edit:
BTW - when I left the entry (which my customization had placed there) in
/etc/fstab for my "permanent" SD card, os6 would not boot
ON THE XO-1
-- it would go into the prompt for emergency mode, then when I ctl-D
would after a while again go into the prompt for emergency mode, etc., etc.
I've already written a ticket saying that on the XO-1, 12.1.0 does not
define any /dev/mmcblk0 (or anything) whose partition could be mounted
onto /bootpart.
Well, on the XO-1, 12.1.0 build os6 goes one step further -- it does not
define any /dev/mmcblk1 (or anything) whose partition I could m
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Jeffrey Kesselman wrote:
> Interestingly enough... e ink screens CAN fold. They are just too slow for
> general tablet use.
Nintendo DS has a pretty decent two-screen solution, but it runs an OS
and apps designed for two screens -- touché.
-walter
>
>
> On Mon, A
Interestingly enough... e ink screens CAN fold. They are just too slow for
general tablet use.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:33 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
> [Summary: 2-screen laptops need fairly deep software support because 2
> screens don't look like 1 screen. I excerpted freely below; see
> the l
[Summary: 2-screen laptops need fairly deep software support because 2
screens don't look like 1 screen. I excerpted freely below; see
the link for the entire story. --gnu]
http://www.afr.com/f/free/technology/digitallife/g_ZWzfPcJsePV9VdQfxY9w1H
Sony's tablet a good idea gone wrong
PUBLISHED:
Hi,
A patch to add CliqueRM support to Wireshark has been sitting in our
queue for the past four years:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2076
We typically don't add a dissector to Wireshark unless we have a sample
packet capture to use for fuzz testing. Would it be possibl
On Apr 2, 2012 7:16 PM, "Yioryos Asprobounitis" wrote:
>
> It would appear that I came up an XO-1 3.3 kernel bug (albeit not with an
OLPC build yet, but the bug is not there with OLPC 2.6.35 or OLPC 3.1 and
identical userspace)
> Its a regression in fs/namei.c, full_name_hash()/hash_name(), regar
It would appear that I came up an XO-1 3.3 kernel bug (albeit not with an OLPC
build yet, but the bug is not there with OLPC 2.6.35 or OLPC 3.1 and identical
userspace)
Its a regression in fs/namei.c, full_name_hash()/hash_name(), regarding files
with 8 character names or multiples of it
More
