On Jul 1, 2013, at 6:24 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> I agree. I've found laptops with looser-than-i-would-like hinge and
> motherboard screws after children have been using them. The hinge
> screws that are uncovered by disassembly were the most interesting.
There was a problem with the manufact
From: James Cameron
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 09:39:11 +1000
> ... but the Preferences dialog, General tab, has no section called
> "Home page".
>
> On the other hand, there's no "Home" button on the toolbar.
Thanks James, ... Peter E.
--
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:39:15PM -0600, Peter Easthope wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
> wrote:
> > Another little issue ...
>
> Speaking of Epiphany, can a hme page be set? Since buying this
> 1.5 which now has 12.1.0, I've relied upon a bookmark for the
> hom
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:16:29AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
> wrote:
> >> Yes. ;-)
> >>
> > Oh, good. That clears it then.
> > Thanks for the insight :-P
>
> Perhaps repeated torsion on the board is one of the factors at play.
> You ma
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
wrote:
> Another little issue ...
Speaking of Epiphany, can a hme page be set? Since buying this
1.5 which now has 12.1.0, I've relied upon a bookmark for the
home page. No answer in forum.
Thanks,... Peter E.
- Original Message -
> From: Daniel Drake
> To: Yioryos Asprobounitis
> Cc: OLPC Devel
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 7:38 PM
> Subject: Re: GNOME on XO-1.75
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
> wrote:
>> Another little issue is that clicking on the scroll bar in
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
wrote:
> Another little issue is that clicking on the scroll bar in epiphany (and also
> gedit and terminal) moves the page to the cursor instead of 1 page down.
This was a GNOME design decision. It is configurable somewhere. You
don't see th
- Original Message -
>
>The crash in X is certainly worth a ticket.
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/12717
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
wrote:
>> Yes. ;-)
>>
> Oh, good. That clears it then.
> Thanks for the insight :-P
Perhaps repeated torsion on the board is one of the factors at play.
You may get a longer life out of it by ensuring that the unit is
tightly assembled (speci
- Original Message -
> From: James Cameron
> To: Yioryos Asprobounitis
> Cc: OLPC Devel
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 1:42 PM
> Subject: Re: resurrected XO-1.5, died again
>
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:19:07AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
>> I guess what I'm asking is that t
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:19:07AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> I guess what I'm asking is that the original board was good for more
> than 2 years. After the reflow, lasted 8 months.
> Is a second reflow likely to last 8 months or 8 days (if at all)?
Yes. ;-)
--
James Cameron
http://q
In Build 3.2.0 for XO-4 (build 11) I have noticed a significant browse
performance problem. On some pages, browse causes X to lock up for many
seconds. The mouse pointer stops moving and you can see (if logged in
via SSH) that X is consuming >80% of the cpu.
https://access.redhat.com/site/docu
- Original Message -
> From: James Cameron
> To: Yioryos Asprobounitis
> Cc: OLPC Devel
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 11:02 AM
> Subject: Re: resurrected XO-1.5, died again
>
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:53:47AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
>> I do not know for how long the "toa
The crash in X is certainly worth a ticket. The other problems sound
a bit interesting too. I haven't had a chance to look at this build
on XO-1.75 yet.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:55:01AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> With the death of my XO-1.5 tried using an XO-1.75 (running 13.2.0-11)
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:53:47AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> I do not know for how long the "toasted" [1] XO-1.5 boards worked
> but my "oven baked" [2] board died again after 8 months of daily use
> and a guestimated 400+ hours. I do not know if this is long enough
> to justify the pr
On 01/07/13 19:55, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
Another little issue is that clicking on the scroll bar in epiphany (and also
gedit and terminal) moves the page to the cursor instead of 1 page down. This
is not happening in firefox.
None of these is happening in the sugar side with browse termi
With the death of my XO-1.5 tried using an XO-1.75 (running 13.2.0-11) for more
than just testing.
Although Sugar is pretty solid, GNOME has several little (or bigger) annoyances.
The more serious is that you can consistently crash X (segfaults) if you try to
re-organise the firefox bookmarks!
I
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:35:03PM +1200, Tom Parker wrote:
> xkbcomp $DISPLAY orig.xkb
> patch -p0 sudo cp orig.xkb /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/mi
> sudo vi /etc/sysconfig/keyboard
> ...
>
> Is Jerry's xs.custom
> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/2013-June/006510.html
> suitable for
I do not know for how long the "toasted" [1] XO-1.5 boards worked but my "oven
baked" [2] board died again after 8 months of daily use and a guestimated 400+
hours.
I do not know if this is long enough to justify the process (roughly half a
school year worth, I would guess), but I thought to rec
On 26/06/13 22:16, Tom Parker wrote:
What is the best way to modify the laptops? Copying modified output of
xkbcomp to /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/mi and running
setxkbmap mi
does the trick, but setting the content of /home/olpc/.Xkbmap to mi does
not make this the default after reboot.
There
20 matches
Mail list logo
