Re: olpc-os-builder

2013-08-12 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:53:42PM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:48 PM, James Cameron wrote: > > Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes; > > one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be > > used offline. This is what I

Re: olpc-os-builder

2013-08-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:48 PM, James Cameron wrote: >> Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes; >> one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be >> used offline. This is what I did for mk

Re: olpc-os-builder

2013-08-12 Thread Daniel Drake
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:48 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes; > one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be > used offline. This is what I did for mktinycorexo. Try the --cache-only option. Daniel _

Re: olpc-os-builder

2013-08-12 Thread Jerry Vonau
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:48 +1000, James Cameron wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:44:09PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Cameron wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > > > Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in

Re: olpc-os-builder

2013-08-12 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:44:09PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Cameron wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > > Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now > > > getting this traceback when trying

Re: olpc-os-builder

2013-08-12 Thread Jerry Vonau
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Cameron wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now > > getting this traceback when trying to run OOB: > > No, olpc-os-builder has worked fine when I tried it

Re: olpc-os-builder

2013-08-12 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now > getting this traceback when trying to run OOB: No, olpc-os-builder has worked fine when I tried it this morning on a similar build. -- James Cameron http://quozl.l

Re: XO-tablet development? [Devel Digest, Vol 90, Issue 7]

2013-08-12 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:14:23AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > Paul wrote: > > UI software and integration was by an OLPC-funded team, which > > until recently was completely separate from the laptop development > > team. > > ie, now is not? yes, now not separate. > If not, which way t

Re: XO-tablet development? [Devel Digest, Vol 90, Issue 7]

2013-08-12 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
> UI software and integration > was by an OLPC-funded team, which until recently was completely > separate from the laptop development team. ie, now is not? If not, which way the tablet/laptop development team is heading? > > paul > =- > paul fox, p...@laptop.org > >

Re: XO-tablet development?

2013-08-12 Thread Paul Fox
frantisek wrote: > Hello, > > sorry if this was already discussed but where development discussion > about new XO-tablet is taking place? Where is the documentation/wiki? there are not yet any public development or documentation channels, that i know of. > > I understand it is android ba

XO-tablet development?

2013-08-12 Thread Frantisek Dufka
Hello, sorry if this was already discussed but where development discussion about new XO-tablet is taking place? Where is the documentation/wiki? I understand it is android based (i.e. very different from xo laptops) but I am still missing discussion about the hardware itself and also the so