On 8 October 2013 01:45, Ruben RodrÃguez ru...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Also, there are some bits of code in both Sugar and the activities
that assume to be running on Fedora, or even on an XO, and those need
cleaning.
Please fix those bits directly upstream! I have not seen any patch
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote:
This actually is kind of what I meant (and perhaps should be a separate
thread).
My understanding is that deployments nowadays are the primary parties
funding Sugar development. And the deployments or their
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure this helps us get around the Marvel bottleneck, but worth
investigating.
-walter
Thx. I've heard about this bottleneck but not sure what it is. Can you
tell us a bit about what it is, or point to it?
There is no Marvell bottleneck. Marvell has confirmed that they
will provide the few binary blobs required compiled in the right way
for Android on XO-4. We just need to provide the target version of
Android.
Cheers,
wad
On Oct 8, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013
Hi,
One of the topics brought up in today's meeting was making the code
and development process more visible. Can we have a discussion on this
list and come to a conclusion on the proposals listed below.
Proposal-1 : Shifting from redmine to github
* Move the xsce source code from the
