Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011

2011-08-24 Thread Bill Gatliff
ect I'm not the only one in that situation. The fact that there has been little response to the ARM Summit doesn't mean that nobody cares or that the problems seem to large to solve. It just means that we're going to have to find a different way to get this work done. b.g. -- Bill

Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011

2011-08-28 Thread Bill Gatliff
eam of three or four people with broad coverage of the SoC devices the kernel supports now. As such refactoring consolidated larger and larger chunks of kernel code, new designs would gravitate towards those consolidated implementations because they would be the dominant references. b.g.

Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011

2011-08-28 Thread Bill Gatliff
Russell: On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:11:41AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: >> As such refactoring consolidated larger and larger chunks of kernel >> code, new designs would gravitate towards those consolidated >