On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 15:16 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Dan Williams's message of Thu May 12 05:11:36 +0200 2011:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 14:52 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> > > This allows individual users and deployments to disable mesh support at
> > > runtime, i.e. without havin
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 14:52 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> This allows individual users and deployments to disable mesh support at
> runtime, i.e. without having to build and maintain a custom kernel.
Does the mesh interface somehow cause problems, even when nothing is
using it? I'd expect that if
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 08:41 -0300, Esteban Bordon wrote:
> You have to put a script calling ntpdate
> in /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/
You can also get the NTP server that may be passed down from DHCP in the
environment of the script on 'up' events. See 'man NetworkManager'.
That's of course
On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 10:03 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> This patch fixes the libertas driver incorrectly reporting that Wake-on-LAN
> is not supported if Wake-on-LAN is currently disabled.
Looks good to me; could you repost to linux-wirel...@vger so I can ack
it and Linville will pick it up?
Dan
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:34 -0300, mabente wrote:
> Very sorry for the late response, here is the messages log and gdb
> backtrace log!
>
> Hopefully it will be helpful :)
Yes, quite. Please try:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.7.2.996-1.fc11,NetworkManager-vpnc-0.7.2.9
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 14:07 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 09:16 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Yeah, I haven't been able to reproduce that, but I only have an XO1.5
> > with me (which doesn't have mesh), and I think the issue is timing
> >
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:38 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 14:11 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: *** START
> > **
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 0:
> > Net
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 22:44 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:08 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 10:20 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 16:15 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > Not a known issue
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 10:20 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 16:15 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Not a known issue; but I'll try to reproduce on mine. Unless Daniel
> > gets there first of course.
>
> I retrieved the log:
I was able to reprodu
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 20:17 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> We didn't collect the logs in the field, but in /var/log/messages we
> found an assertion failure from NM which was more or less like "driver !
> = NULL", just after logging something about the OLPC mesh device.
> Wireless wasn't working
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 16:23 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 16:19, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
> > Following the "let's make Sugar more deployable" theme that Daniel
> > started a while ago, I am looking at something that Reuben mentioned
> > last week he discovered in the field.
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 02:34 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 06:09:58PM -0400, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
> > Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> >> I'm setting the ESSID on the msh0 interface indeed. But i never get an
> >> association event on it.. While i even get an association
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:09 -0400, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
> Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> > I'm setting the ESSID on the msh0 interface indeed. But i never get an
> > association event on it.. While i even get an association event on eth0 when
> > it's not up (but with msh0 being up obviously)
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 19:42 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working on adding support for the olpc mesh device to NM 0.7.
I feel sorry for you :) In some ways 0.7 has made it a lot better for
you (concurrent device support) and in other ways it's made it a bit
harder (more e
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 22:08 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:28 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > I'm happy to test this out and try to
> > get the userspace tool working again if given:
>
> Last time I knew, the userspace tool _was_ working.
>
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware and:
>
> echo > /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_boot2
> echo > /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_fw
So by this point the driver has already sent BOOT_CMD_FW_BY_USB and
there's alrea
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:09 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/03/2008 12:09:11 PM:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:30 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:20:51
> AM:
> > >
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:49 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/03/2008 01:20:11 PM:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:03 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> > > Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:03 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/03/2008 11:26:21 AM:
>
>
> > > >
> > > It is not a matter of Python vs C.
> > > The userspace tool is extremely awkward to use (since it requ
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:30 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:20:51 AM:
>
>
> > >
> > > A necessary rectification:
> > > Firmware updates from the driver are the only method that works
> > > currently. If we want to name one method a "disaster", we would ha
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:26 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:37 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 10:12:31 AM:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> > > > To update boot2
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:18 -0400, John Watlington wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2008, at 11:08 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:03 -0400, John Watlington wrote:
> >>
> >> My bad. This is now Trac #7170
> >> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7170
> >>
> >> All of the information in this
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:37 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 10:12:31 AM:
>
> > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> > > To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware
> and:
> > >
> > > echo > /sys/class/net/eth2
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:34 -0300, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> >> To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware and
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware and:
>
> echo > /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_boot2
> echo > /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_fw
So why are we doing this with the driver, and not the userspace update
tool? Marvel
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 12:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 07:01 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Is the firmware multicast address limit the same for every firmware from
> > 5.0.x up to 9? Is it something that people with the firmware dev kit
> > can ch
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 20:48 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 15:38 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On an SMP host, are you sure we can't end up setting the multicast list
> > > simultaneously on the two logical devices?
> >
> > (A: No.)
>
> Try it like this... completely
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 17:51 +0200, Stefanik Gábor wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Johannes Berg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 15:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 11:01 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> >> > This patch is based on a patch f
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 14:58 -0200, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
> I installed d-feet on an XO. But when I run './d-feet -l' I get:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/d-feet", line 47, in
> app = DFeetApp.DFeetApp()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dfeet/DFeetApp.py
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 18:38 +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to use a USB-SVGA adapter based on the SiS 35x chips with a XO
> Beta4. It seems like even with an external USB hub which is externally
> powered, the SVGA adapter does not received enough power, which I find
>
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 21:03 +0100, Rózsás Gödény wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I hope you can make options to start with any of the 3
> firmwares.
> Perhaps I wish to try writing a boot1 or boot2.
Um, Boot1 is burned into ROM on the 8388 and you probably can't change
that without a
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 14:40 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Dan Williams writes:
>
> > No, you can't. One team reverse engineers the hardware and
> > creates a specifications document, the second team implements
> > (from scratch or from unencumbered FOSS source
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 11:24 -0500, Tom Hoffman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to get a USB2VGA adapter working. Step 1 would appear to
> be compiling the SISUSBVGA module in the standard kernel tree and
> getting it onto my XO.
>
> So I've been trying http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Rebuilding_OLPC_k
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Citando Rózsás Gödény <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I started to modify qemu to emulate 88W8388. Now it can load the firmware (
> > usb8388.bin) into ram and starts the firmware, albeit it drops an error
> > after some time. So it is very
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 19:05 +, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves wrote:
> On 1/21/08, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Except that it's completely insane to try to diverge from the upstream
> > kernel and userland here.
>
> Uh? You are supposed to costumiz
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 18:30 +, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves wrote:
> On 1/21/08, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It may be open, but it isn't much of a standard.
> > I've only found one implementation, csound itself.
> > There are no hardware implementations.
>
> See, just because a sta
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 13:05 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote:
>
>
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/19/2008 12:48:06 PM:
>
>
> >
> > Hmm, ok... So all the external USB 8388 dongles have a larger SPI
> flash
> > to contain both the Boot2 co
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 04:31 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 14:47 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > What is the post-boot firmware flash functionality supposed to apply to,
> > the host-less active antenna? (which is what I heretofore had
> > understo
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 01:38 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 10:08 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Yes. The active antennas firmware would need to be slightly altered to
> > start on firmware boot, but the normal XO firmware should certainly be
> > r
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 10:33 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/18/2008 10:08:09 AM:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 08:36 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:16 -0500, Giannis Galanis wrote:
> > > &
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 08:36 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:16 -0500, Giannis Galanis wrote:
> > It must be noted that the important issue of this discussion is how to have
> > the radio blocked from BEFORE the XO boots, so as not to be conflicting with
> > the airline regu
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 14:18 -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> >> To completely silence the radio:
> >> #!/bin/bash
> >> rmmod usb8xxx
> >> mv /lib/firmaware/usb8883.bin /lib/firmaware/usb8883.bin.quiet
>
> > For a more user-friendly solution, (short of a hardware rfkill switch)
> > put a toggle some
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 09:51 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> I suppose that OFW could reset the wireless to turn it off and then do
> some chipset configuration hack that would make that USB port
> disappear. I'm just guessing though; I haven't studied the 5536 manual
> with this possibility in mi
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:06 -0200, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
> Indeed we had this airplane mode discussion two weeks ago:
> Why don't we?
> ---
This is the correct sledgehammer approach as mbletsas has consistently
pointed out.
For a more user-friendly solution, (short of a hardware rfkill s
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 13:30 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> Hal Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/17/2008 12:55:47 PM:
>
> >
> > > When it comes to our radio - we *designed it* to start forward frames
> > > soon after you initialize it and keep doing it regardless of what the
> > > host inte
od the radioon/radiooff stuff to do anyway,
hence the objection to another non-standard ioctl.
Dan
>
>
> "Edward Cherlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/16/2008 06:56:17 PM:
>
> > On Jan 16, 2008 2:46 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 14:01 -0800, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> 2008/1/16 Ricardo Carrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > IMHO, there is no point in investing time in mesh stop/start now (or any
> > time in the future unless there is a strong reason for that - which we lack
> > now).
>
> The stated reason for
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:22 -0200, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
> I believe what you want is "radio off", not "mesh stop".
"radio off" == iwconfig eth0 txpower off
that's always been around from day #1.
> On Jan 16, 2008 8:01 PM, Edward Cherlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/1/16 Ricardo C
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:11 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/16/2008 10:48:13 AM:
>
>
> > There's a long explanation for that, but the short one is that the
> > driver should no longer periodically run around in cir
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 13:10 -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If you, for example, are transfering a file when the XO enters in
>> power savings mode, the transfer will halt.
>
> For how long? As soon as the XO hits suspend, the WLAN/EC will
> assert wakeup on receipt of the next unica
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 19:29 -0500, Giannis Galanis wrote:
> David,
>
> There are a couple of issues i would like to address, mostly related
> to the new wireless driver.
>
> First, the netstat command:
> About 50% of the time it becomes very slow(practically freezes) and
> spews a "getnameinfo er
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:03 -0800, Wilhelm Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I'm trying to understand the legal state of MP3 versus the OLPC
> platform. Looking at this wiki page:
>
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Restricted_Formats
>
> Seems to indicate that handling MP3 requires a license, and thus an
> MP
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, John Gilmore wrote:
>
> >>> IP addresses are going to change; that's a fact of life.
> >
> >> I know nothing about routing, but if a participant's IP address is about to
> >> change, perhaps the change should be bro
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 00:09 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> >>
> >> In the server-based backend, an IP address change *will* cause a
> >> disconnect and reconnect. This is definitely unavoidable, since XMPP
> &g
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 09:00 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 at 22:17:18 -0500, John Watlington wrote:
> > We have a presence service which
> > provides a way for P2P applications to find
> > one another, even after the IP cha
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 17:18 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote:
> >
> > In the School Server case, using DHCP as the allowed us to collapse two
> > steps of the connection process into one. With the previous method, you
> > would have to _both_ find the MPP using the non-standard MPP discovery
> > meth
gn. And it makes the mesh interfaces on a single
> server
> serve the entire school. Why bother with multiple MPPs at all ?
>
> >> We briefly discussed using a different autoIP range, and decided
> >> it was
> >> difficult to implement.
> >>
&g
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:18 -0600, Charles Durrett wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2008 11:21 AM, Michail Bletsas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>
> The largest issue is how wrong, ugly and painful is to use
> DHCP on a mesh
> network.
> Because of RADV, IPv6 does
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 11:14 -0500, Marcus Leech wrote:
> I use WPA-PSK (WPA personal) at home, and I've noticed anomalies.
>
> One of the big ones is that it keeps re-prompting for the passphrase
> (this is with Joyride 1438), and tearing-down the
> association. I looked at /var/log/messages w
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:14 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote:
>
>
> "Ricardo Carrano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/13/2007
> 02:54:11 PM:
>
>
> >
> > - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really crashed
> > WPA support, I
> > mean, now we cannot set it to work via wpa_supplicant
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 11:10 +0100, Pascal Scheffers wrote:
> Works for me on a Sitecom WL-174 WPA-PSK network. One of yesterdays
> joyrides.
Works for me with 650 against a Linksys WRT54GC after disabling the
SIGCHLD handler in /usr/bin/sugar-shell.
I actually can't get it to fail, though I'm in
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:03 -0800, Peter Krenesky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to initialize the camera device and running into some
> errors. I'm attempting to use the mmap interface initialized by
> VIDIOCGMBUF ioctl. the ioctl is returning -1 and errno is 22.
>
> Is VIDIOCGMBUF/mmap ev
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 10:39 -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> We do already have a video-chat activity under development - due to
>> priorities it hasn't been updated in a while but collaboration on
>> that would be welcome.
>
> In particular I think the problems with video-chat wer
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 19:05 -0500, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Yesterday I tried upgrading yoyride to Fedora 8, to see
> how much pain it would be.
>
> After enabling the fedora repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo and
> tweaking it to make it fetch from version 8, I just did:
>
> init 3
> yu
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 02:06 -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>> Last I knew there were cases where mesh forwarding was _not_
>> supposed to be on due to the high power drain of the 8388 when the
>> radio was enabled, plus the airplane case. As long as the
>> networking core do
off
> > the radio and save power.
> >
> > It also cleans up some of the mess that was *_open, the intent for
> which
> > (unless I'm reading that code wrong) was just to check whether the
> > interface was up or not, since that's what open/close do.
>
>
> What's the plan for UI for this?
>
> --elijah
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, James Cameron wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:26:57 +1100
> > From: James Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc
was *_open, the intent for which
(unless I'm reading that code wrong) was just to check whether the
interface was up or not, since that's what open/close do.
Comments?
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cmd.c
b/drivers/net/wirele
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 09:54 -0500, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Joyride-277 doesn't validate, because it contains a file from the
> library with a filename in non-normalized unicode. The file is named
> 'Annobo?n_Bioko-thumb.jpg', where the ? should be a separated accent
> on the o, but it is actuall
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 16:17 -0700, Javier Cardona wrote:
> Andres,
>
> On 11/2/07, Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
> > Ashish Shukla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So, uh.. This patch is from Javier, but was originally written by
> > Ashis
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 13:38 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:29:50 -0400
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 15:42 -0700, Javier Cardona wrote:
> > > From: Brajesh Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 15:42 -0700, Javier Cardona wrote:
> From: Brajesh Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> See https://dev.laptop.org/ticket/2750#comment:12
>
> Requires firmware version 5.110.19.p0 or newer, available here:
> http://dev.laptop.org/pub/firmware/libertas/
What I'd like to do with pat
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:15 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We still have one set of OLPC-specific patches to Salut (the link-local
> collaboration backend) that has been rejected upstream, which is the one
> that adds support for the deprecated i
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 14:29 +0100, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> does anyone know if is there a way to retrieve the
> activity bundle top directory name under python/sugar?
You should be able to:
from sugar.activity import activity
my_bundle_path = activity.get_bundle_path()
Dan
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 07:49 +1000, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have Ubuntu 7.04 with 2.6.20-16 and want to use the 8388 USB module
> > with my system. I guess I either need to jump to 2.6.22, or compile the
> > driver for 2.6.20. I
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 15:22 -0400, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
> I have Ubuntu 7.04 with 2.6.20-16 and want to use the 8388 USB module
> with my system. I guess I either need to jump to 2.6.22, or compile the
> driver for 2.6.20. I would prefer the second as the upstream version of
> the dri
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 19:52 +1000, Alex Gibson wrote:
> Javier Cardona wrote:
> > On 9/13/07, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Are there patents on 802.11s? Even though
> >> it's an IEEE standard?
> >>
> >
> > http://standards.ieee.org/db/patents/pat802_11.html
> >
>
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 06:52 -0700, big one wrote:
> > No VGA/EGA/CGA.
>
> This is some sort of free VESA BIOS and the author said the source code can
> be ported to Linux platform:
>
> http://www.talula.demon.co.uk/freebe/
>
> Another option is virtual graphics card (VGC) from Displaylink. The
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 07:50 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 06:18 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> > I would recommend not making the patch; I think I found it confusing
> > only because I didn't know that random impacted link-local. But do we
> > still
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 06:18 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> I would recommend not making the patch; I think I found it confusing
> only because I didn't know that random impacted link-local. But do we
> still default to channel 1 if no school server is found?
No, I'm not confident that we do.
Dan
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 12:12 -0400, Mike C. Fletcher wrote:
> John Watlington wrote:
> >>> Suppose I'm someplace where I don't expect or want to do any mesh
> >>> networking.
> >>> How much would turning off the radio help battery life?
> >>>
> >> Last I checked, the effect was very small. T
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 15:33 -0400, Richard A. Smith wrote:
> John Watlington wrote:
>
> > While it makes sense to turn off the wireless networking interface on
> > developer
>
> So there's a slight problem with powering off the wireless interface
> from an electrical standpoint. You can't.
>
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:52 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> moin,
>
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:42:51 +1000
> James Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Do we need a solid way to turn off the RF before it's OK to use an XO
> > > on an airplane?
> >
> > Our target market usually won't have t
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 06:55 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 16:10 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 19:52 +0100, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
> > > Thanks, I am now seeing my wireless router on
> > > the machines and can ping other mac
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 00:36 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> I'm wondering if one could replace the 88W8385
> on a gumstix board with an 88W8388 swiped from
> an Xbox 360 wireless device.
>
> They appear to be the same chip package. This of
> course does not ensure that enough of the
> connections a
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 19:52 +0100, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
> Thanks, I am now seeing my wireless router on
> the machines and can ping other machines connected
> to it. Wired internet seems to work (as far as ifconfig
> and ping are concerned).
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1. How should I set my hostna
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:08 +0100, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Got the delivery of two B4 machines and joined the list today. I am
> trying to test the system, so would like to get some help. I am
> starting with networking; I have not yet updated to the latest OS image,
> though.
>
>
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 12:27 +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 06:12 -0400, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> > > There was an alternative libertas driver which uses the device in 'dumb'
> > > mode with the kernel's mac80211 stack. Coupled with mesh support in
> > > mac80211 that might
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 14:19 -0400, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> On 09/11/2007 01:32 PM, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>
> > The 16bpp codepath has to be broken somewhere if
> > it takes twice the time to copy half the bits :-)
>
> It strikes me that we don't see any time spent in
> pixman_fill_mmx(),
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 13:03 -0400, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> (adding xorg-devel@ on Cc)
>
> On 09/11/2007 11:29 AM, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > On 11/09/07 13:05 +0200, Stefano Fedrigo wrote:
> >> I've done some more profiling on the 16 vs. 24 bpp issue.
> >> This time I used this test:
> >> https:
u believe that the effort is appreciated and
> that documentation will not appear without your efforts.
>
> It is even more fun if you can discover dark secrets, such as when
> somebody spotted Marvell using the GPL eCos OS for a different chip.
> That guy even had the balls to attack
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 10:31 -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> As I understand it, the microkernel for the Marvell wireless chipset
> is the only remaining proprietary software on the Laptop, and although
> we want to get rid of it, nothing is happening.
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/46
> Is that cor
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 10:03 -0400, John Watlington wrote:
> Dan,
> The Reliance team in India is having trouble getting the
> anycast_mask flag set.
>
> A mesh interface is configured and up and running. They echo 1 > /
> sys/class/net/msh0/anycast_mask,
> but subsequent cat /sys/class/n
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 15:43 -0400, Samuel Klein wrote:
> what was the reason not to support firefox addons again?
Well, it's not really a decision, but more of a side-effect. The best
and most flexible embedding technology to use is pyxpcom. We're
embedding a Gecko engine into a different app, a
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 08:51 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 06:08:05AM -0800, C.W. Holeman II wrote:
> > I have :
> > olpc-redhat-stream-development-devel_ext3.img
> > which I am running with qemu. How do I ask it what version it is?
>
> Mount this filesystem, then read the
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:08 -0400, Nelson Elhage wrote:
> Here's a fixed version of the patch.
Built as:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84355
dan
> - Nelson
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 08:03:00AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-07-28 a
Hi,
This firmware came in too late for the Trial-2 builds, but we'd like
testing nonetheless. If anyone wants to give it a run, I've prepared an
RPM you can install on the XO:
wget
http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/olpc/libertas-usb8388-firmware-5.110.17.p0-1.olpc1.noarch.rpm
rpm -Uhv libertas-usb8
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 11:43 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On 7/27/07, Nelson Elhage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is a patch to olpc-util to add a script to register the XO with
> > the schoolserver for purposes of backup for trial 2
> > (http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/24).
>
> > +sn =
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 17:00 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> I've updated autoupdatinator (the peer-to-peer mDNS version of the
> updatinator downloader) to work with the new repository layout where
> manifests are stored as blobs. I've tested it by publishing an apache
> http server with a static
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 00:36 +0800, Trent Lloyd wrote:
> Hi Sjoerd,
>
> Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 05:16:17PM +0200, Michael Rueger wrote:
> >
> >> Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> The Chat activity can uses multi-user chats afaik, which is something only
> >>> sup
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
