On 13 May 2014 16:13, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 May 2014 21:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
First, thanks for doing this work.
Thanks for helping out.
I would like
On 13 May 2014 01:49, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
* Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or
fork it? I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the
linux side of things, if not maybe better to turn this into a
sugarlabs thing.
Contribute,
(a vm I setup
yesterday). Then I'll do builds with the fixes Martin sent.
On 13 May 2014 04:27, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
Downloading!
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
xo4 image finally built (untested yet)
http
The xo1 image boots into sugar (latest from git) and wifi works. I'm now
building xo4 images
On 12 May 2014 02:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple more images, for xo1 and xo1.5. They have sugar packages built
from latest sugar git. I have not tested them yet so they might
in the screen.
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
The xo1 image boots into sugar (latest from git) and wifi works. I'm now
building xo4 images
On 12 May 2014 02:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple more images, for xo1 and xo1.5
kernel panic, but as Gonzalo mentioned the
fading problem is still present.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
I will attach a serial cable later and report.
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
How far
Looks like eth0 is not initialized and all stop there.
Probably you already know that, but xo-1 and xo-1.5 have a 8686 wireless
card, different to the 8787 in the xo-4
Gonzalo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, at least the partitions problem
acceleration)
[32.854] (II) VIA(0): Enable EXA Now
[32.854] (II) VIA(0): [EXA] Trying to enable EXA acceleration.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not quite convinced this is due to the not initialized eth0 (I'm not
sure what that is due too
[32.854] (II) Composite (RENDER acceleration)
[32.854] (II) VIA(0): Enable EXA Now
[32.854] (II) VIA(0): [EXA] Trying to enable EXA acceleration.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not quite convinced this is due
Hello,
things are looking good so far, we already have all the models booting into
sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working. I would like to take a step back
and understand a bit better where we want to go with this. Some random
thoughts and questions.
* To really understand how much work is
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
things are looking good so far, we already have all the models booting
into
sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working. I would like to take a step
back
and understand a bit better
On 12 May 2014 21:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
First, thanks for doing this work.
Thanks for helping out.
I would like to take a step back and understand a bit better where we
want to go with this. Some random thoughts and questions.
* To really understand how much
On 13 May 2014 00:43, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
daniel wrote:
* Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or fork
it?
I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the linux side
of
things, if not maybe better to turn this into a sugarlabs thing.
xo4 image finally built (untested yet)
http://bender.sugarlabs.org:3000/images/xo4/2/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
freeze.
On 11 May 2014 00:24, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
great!! Let me know when you have an image with this!
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Firmware loading works with the rebuilt systemd! I have not tested much
but wifi
...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
Downloading...
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Martin Abente
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
Downloading 10001xx1.zd , will let you know how it goes soon.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
I made builds for xo1
:)
I have arm packages for latest git almost built, so tomorrow I should be
able to build xo1.75 and xo4 images too. The oob configurations and some
initial bits of automated builds infra are now here
https://github.com/dnarvaez/xugar
On 11 May 2014 20:49, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote
Firmware loading works with the rebuilt systemd! I have not tested much but
wifi works now. Next step, build images with latest sugar...
On 10 May 2014 01:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I built a xo4 image, which like 1.75 boots fine into sugar
http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez
I built an image for 1.75
http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/
I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick with me and
having troubles finding something the XO likes.
On 8 May 2014 02:04, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
As an update, I have patched xorg
On 9 May 2014 14:24, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck
On 9 May 2014 15:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good
enough introspection to make the port compatible with it.
If anybody would like to work
with stuff, building in the
virtual machine takes really too long.
On 9 May 2014 14:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I built an image for 1.75
http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/
I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick with me
and having troubles
By the way, I suspect the issue with small icons is something we already
fixed in 0.101. As soon as we have the base system working decently I'm
planning to make builds with latest sugar from git.
On 10 May 2014 01:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I built a xo4 image, which like
PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
As an update, I have patched xorg-x11-drv-dove and built rpms for it
http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/f20-xo1.75/
Now building an image with those.
On 7 May 2014 15:18, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.comwrote:
Great!
I
On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good
enough introspection to make the port compatible with it.
If anybody would like to work on moving olpc
for testing :)
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
[...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good
enough
list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
explain the
different sources of bits and development to me?
--scott
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org javascript:;
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Devel mailing
I don't have much of a clue about Write but... can you send the activity
log?
On 4 November 2013 16:14, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would be good if you could launch
it with sugar-launch -d and post the backtrace., possibly after having
installed debug packages.
On 4 November 2013 21:25, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll open a bug + patch.
On 4 November 2013 22:40, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll
open a bug + patch.
Thanks! Let me know when you've got a patch
On 5 November 2013 00:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll
:)
On 5 November 2013 00:23, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
I poked my abiword friends, expect the commit shortly.
cjl
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon
On 1 November 2013 21:59, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Use this phase of the process as an opportunity for you and your
people to practice communicating with other developers in the
community; and measure the effort in the design process, not the
achievements.
+1
In the first
On 1 November 2013 22:09, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 November 2013 21:59, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Use this phase of the process as an opportunity for you and your
people to practice communicating with other developers in the
community; and measure the effort
/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.100.0.tar.xz
Thanks to everyone that contributed with code, translations and testing!
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On 29 October 2013 20:29, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote:
Phase two -- Let's look at lessons learned from other projects. We can
focus on the road map and product specification. From my experience,
these two piece can provide an anchor for the rest of the project:
1. The act
On 31 October 2013 19:31, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
Here's OLPC's mission, as a reminder:
Mission Statement: To create educational opportunities for the world's
poorest children by providing each
On 1 November 2013 03:22, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 31 October 2013 19:31, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote
?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On 29 October 2013 01:14, David Farning
dfarn...@activitycentral.comjavascript:;
wrote:
As two Data points:
In a private conversation with an Association employee they told me
On 23 October 2013 19:51, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:48 PM, David Farning
dfarn...@activitycentral.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
[snip]
I don't understand what you are asking. Sugar
On 29 October 2013 01:14, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote:
As two Data points:
In a private conversation with an Association employee they told me
that they conciser Activity Central a competitor because Activity
Central increased deployments expectations. Their strategy with
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On 9 October 2013 22:51, NoiseEHC noise...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I will not give you constructive criticism as that would allow
answering that I should not tell others what to do and it would be
getting old... Instead here is some nonconstructive criticism:
I don't know if it's constructive
On 10 October 2013 00:22, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
1 Inability to do OAuth
This has been discussed for Firefox OS too and as far as I know there is
no good solution for it yet. I won't claim to understand all the security
implications, tough the basic issue seems to run
On 8 October 2013 01:45, Ruben RodrÃguez ru...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Also, there are some bits of code in both Sugar and the activities
that assume to be running on Fedora, or even on an XO, and those need
cleaning.
Please fix those bits directly upstream! I have not seen any patch
Hello,
I setup a buildbot instance to build the packages daily, using the XO as a
build slave for arm
http://sugarlabs.org:8011/waterfall
https://github.com/dnarvaez/archbot
You can pull them by adding this to your /etc/pacman.conf
[sugar]
SigLevel = Never
Server =
On 7 October 2013 19:24, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote:
- Updating the Sugar release in Ubuntu sounds like something everyone
could benefit from, not just Dextrose users. Is there any reason not to
base most of this work starting with upstream Sugar existing Ubuntu
On 7 October 2013 18:41, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Would either of these list be appropriate to continue these
discussions about this downstream efforts to port sugar to Ubuntu for
use on hardware not sold by the Association?
Phase one has been a poof of concept as
more flexible. Anyway not opposed to send all modules to the whole
mailing list if there is consensus on that.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On 7 October 2013 23:39, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I agree with Samuel; that with the loss of public review of patches
participation in development has been confined to those who take the
trouble to visit a web site.
(The reviews by mail were also stimulating other discussion on
On 8 October 2013 00:08, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
James, Sam, I see this as a question of taste.
Exactly.
The sooner people understand that, the sooner we will stop having
discussions about the review process over and over :)
___
On 8 October 2013 00:22, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:00:47AM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Well everyone seems to be developing their own version of Sugar
seems to be more than that. But maybe I'm just reading too much into
it.
There aren't multiple
On 8 October 2013 01:07, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote:
This actually is kind of what I meant (and perhaps should be a separate
thread).
To simplify things I will only answer about the 0.100 release cycle. Things
have changed a lot anyway and it's probably not worth focusing on
55 matches
Mail list logo
