On Thursday 26 February 2009 05:09:27 pm James Cameron wrote:
> > Something is wrong with my olpc in either the xserver or hardware. For
> > other non-drawing tasks its speed seems to be reasonable.
>
> Yes, something is wrong. Have you another XO you can test?
>
Now I narrowed down my X related
On Saturday 28 February 2009 05:51:40 pm James Cameron wrote:
> > 3, every once in a while (10 mins or so) there is a message in console
> > like:
> > JFFS2 warning: jffs2_sum_write_sumnode: Not enough space for summary,
> > padsize=-60
>
> That matches a known problem. The JFFS2 filesystem is
On Thursday 26 February 2009 05:09:27 pm James Cameron wrote:
> > Something is wrong with my olpc in either the xserver or hardware. For
> > other non-drawing tasks its speed seems to be reasonable.
>
> Yes, something is wrong. Have you another XO you can test?
>
I installed latest
xserver-xorg
On Thursday 26 February 2009 12:02:46 am James Cameron wrote:
> After generating an xorg.conf using "Xorg -configure", restarting X,
> results were 3.696s, 3.700s, 3.607s.
>
> After adding 'Option "FBSize" "8388608"', restarting X, results were
> 3.673s, 3.636s, 3.658s.
>
> The generated xorg.con
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 11:52:11 pm James Cameron wrote:
> debxo 0.5 KDE variant booted from USB, installed rxvt, started "rxvt -fn
> 12x24", maximised, took a sample log (dmesg) which was 523 lines,
> appended it many times to generate a file 7322 lines long, then used:
>
> time cat f
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 02:11:08 am qu...@laptop.org wrote:
> Then I installed the Debian x11-apps package, and did some performance
> timings, using "time x11perf -time 1 -repeat 1 -all", with different
> configurations, to try to reproduce your observation;
By the way, I don't think timing
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 02:11:08 am qu...@laptop.org wrote:
> I tried placing just the Option line you specified in an empty
> xorg.conf, but X would not start, complaining of syntax error in the
> file.
You have to make valid xorg.conf file and add it to the Device section. The
easiest way
On Monday 23 February 2009 04:48:52 pm qu...@laptop.org wrote:
> Sounds interesting. Which version of debxo?
0.4
> Show us the output of /proc/meminfo.
de...@debxo:~$ cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 221776 kB
MemFree:174732 kB
Buffers: 0 kB
Cached: 19192 kB
SwapCach
Hi all,
I am running debxo on a XO I got from 2008 G1G1. I just noticed that the memory
size is only
221776K according to /proc/meminfo. I know that there is 16M used as video
memory, so there should be 256M-16M = 240M available to linux, right? I search
around and see some people has about 237
