Hattori seiko co. ltd
No 457624 made in Japan.
FCC ID C4Z7NSUM0120
Pictures on the Wiki..
.http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Seiko_uc2200
--
Steve Holton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
e data (e.g., formats)
> that are made available to it. If not, the Activity should notify
> the user of the incompatibility.
> p.s. One of my "hot buttons" is 'hooking up' additional Activities
> which are resident on a removable storage device. Obviously, such
> A
hich is less controlled: an easy place for developers to distribute
>> their latest stuff which is expected to work but might not. I've also
>> been pushing for new features to land first on 'experimental'
>> equivalent branches: Dennis' FC9 is a good example here. It
y.
>
> I am surprised how things that can be done in a clear, productive and
> inoffensive way end up being showcases of miscommunication, cause all kinds
> of hurt feelings, and actual information has to be derived through
> over-analysis and guesswork.
Or, to sum it u
be able to
> run on any Linux distro. I know that it is hard... but IF we are able
> to take this step back then Sugar (and many
> other things) will be in better competitive position.
Trying to "out-compete" an organization which has a history of illegal
anti-competitive behavio
t; My copy of this mail (as available at
>> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-May/005752.html ) does not
>> have the attachment of the mission statement.
>>
>> -- Asheesh.
>>
>> --
>> Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Steve Holton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems a recipe for dumping the designers into the hell of constantly,
> > interactively explaining to the test
at the component was
supposed to do in the first place?
It seems a recipe for dumping the designers into the hell of constantly,
interactively explaining to the testers what was expected, what wasn't, and
why.
--
Steve Holton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
27;t been released yet, or declares a problem "fixed" because some later,
as yet unreleased version no longer shows the problem.
It ain't fixed if, in order to get the fix, you need to "...don't expect it
to work, don't expect your system to even
te-up, I promise!
>
> Bryan W. Berry
> Systems Engineer
> OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
>
>
>
> _______
> Olpc-open mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-open
>
--
Steve Holton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
ng to the XO as a laptop is a lose-lose situation.
--
Steve Holton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
logy by the
millions. It should be clear that Microsoft's generous offer to port
Windows XP to the XO is motivated by exactly this business rationale.)
--
Steve Holton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
12 matches
Mail list logo