On 08-09-19, at 18:27, Greg Smith wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks a lot for the input on which activities to ship!
>
> Here is the list of activities I will to management as my suggestion
> on what we ship.
>
> Please help test these! See the end of the e-mail for instructions.
>
> The list I recom
TamTamJam v50
TamTamEdit v49
TamTamSynthLab v50
TamTamMin v48
I dont know why we even bother making new bundles with bug fixes
that never get included into the builds. I mean the TamTam you are
using is like 8 months old...
Anyone care?
On 08-08-05, at 15:56, Christoph Derndorfer wro
I wish to state my profound disagreement with the inclusion of this
activity on the XO. It goes counter to the essential cultural
neutrality of OLPC. If countries wish to put this activity on the XO,
so be it, but IMO, OLPC should not in any way be associated with this
endeavour.
jp
O
mmm... After a couple of flags raised and an approval from Jim from a
couple of weeks ago (http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6521), the old
TamTam versions are still being used in the builds.
Any explanation?
jp
On 5-Mar-08, at 12:01 AM, Build Announcer v2 wrote:
> http://pilgrim.laptop.org
Hello,
Why are old TamTam builds still being used for update.1 builds,
thereby not including current .po files?
uptodate versions (and in curent joyride) are:
TamTamEdit = 47
TamTamMini = 46
TamTamSynthLab = 48
TamTamJam = 48
according build.log, versions in last build (694) are:
TamTam
New TamTam bundle will be uploaded sometime this morning.
jp
On 13-Feb-08, at 6:43 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 11:12 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have information about the releases of new packages (to pickup
>> translations) for the following modules:
>>
>
Albert,
The reason MIDI is a standard is because it was the first inter-
synthesizer communication protocol out of the gates in 1983. It is not
a good standard because MIDI was specified to convey the minimum
amount of data over a bit less 32 kbps to be musically useful. Thus
the restrict
