Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Children want Sugar 0.84, for the wrong reason

2010-03-13 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Forgot to answer a paragraph: On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 12:07 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > > If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better > > quality than build 801, provided you disable automatic power management

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Children want Sugar 0.84, for the wrong reason

2010-03-13 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 12:07 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > > If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better > > quality than build 801, provided you disable automatic power management. > > Are all activities worki

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Children want Sugar 0.84, for the wrong reason

2010-03-13 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better > quality than build 801, provided you disable automatic power management. Are all activities working, including collaboration? In Gnome, can you actually use FF? Came

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Children want Sugar 0.84, for the wrong reason

2010-03-13 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 10:46 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 08:33 -0500, Gerald Ardito wrote: > > > >> By the way, how do you upgrade the XOs (we have XO-1s) to .84? This is > >> a very big deal for us. > > > > We u

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Children want Sugar 0.84, for the wrong reason

2010-03-13 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 08:33 -0500, Gerald Ardito wrote: > >> By the way, how do you upgrade the XOs (we have XO-1s) to .84? This is >> a very big deal for us. > > We use a local variant of the F11-XO1 images by Stephen Parrish, signed > wi