Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
Again, start up time is not a problem. Etoys start up looks a bit
slow on XO, but that is because the DBus communication that has to be
done.
I frequently hear DBus being accused of latency. As badly
implemented as it might be, I can't believe a daemon
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I'd like to check if we could do anything to reduce our
dependence on DBus to provide basic desktop services for which
there are existing Freedesktop standards and long established
X conventions.
If we manage to
Am 25.06.2008 um 10:49 schrieb Marco Pesenti Gritti:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Bernie Innocenti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I'd like to check if we could do anything to reduce our
dependence on DBus to provide basic desktop services for which
there are existing Freedesktop
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
If we manage to make DBus entirely optional, the initial effort
of porting a Linux applications to Sugar would be greatly
simplified.
As far as I know this is already the case. The only non standard bit
are a couple of custom X properties.
Oh, is there a way
Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
Again, start up time is not a problem. Etoys start up looks a bit
slow on XO, but that is because the DBus communication that has to be
done.
I frequently hear DBus being accused of latency. As badly
implemented as it might be, I can't believe a daemon relaying
a
