On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:44:11AM -0700, Stanley Sokolow wrote:
Personally, I feel it is a mistake for the OLPC project to continue with the
concept of the Sugar platform as its exclusive model for an educational
computer.The Sugar applications (activities) could just as well be run
from
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Stanley
Sokolowstanleysoko...@gmail.com wrote:
Mikus,
I've been using the Ubuntu version customized for the XO for a couple of
days now. (See www.olpcnews.com for info about Teapot's XO-customized
Ubuntu 8.10 release.) It is a little slow compared with my
Mikus,
I've been using the Ubuntu version customized for the XO for a couple of
days now. (See www.olpcnews.com for info about Teapot's XO-customized
Ubuntu 8.10 release.) It is a little slow compared with my other
computers, as expected for a computer running at less than .5 GHz, but much
Disclaimer: This post contains Off-Topic meta discussion
Conclusion:
fedora-olpc, to be a sucess, needs a much slimmer UI than that
of GNOME.
Success needs to be defined. Seems to me the OLPC was envisioned
mainly for a single-application environment. Except for being slow at
