On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> DNS-SD using unicast DNS seems reasonable to me too.
If we can do without the avahi gunk, and use it in a way that is not
optimised for user driven browsing but for automated selection of
services, then it might work.
> Looking closer at
martin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > DNS-SD using unicast DNS seems reasonable to me too.
>
> If we can do without the avahi gunk, and use it in a way that is not
> optimised for user driven browsing but for automated selection of
> services, then it
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I don't understand your question. Sounds like prefetching that isn't
> part of dns (id you perhaps think of DHCP here?)
I don't have my well-worn "DNS and BIND" book with me right now but I
am positive that the server side can decide to
jonas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:45:28AM -0400, p...@laptop.org wrote:
> >benjamin m. schwartz wrote:
> > > Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > > > The short of it is that mdns/dns-sd make sense for a small,
> > > > underutilised network
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I don't understand your question. Sounds like prefetching that isn't
part of dns (id you perhaps think of DHCP here?)
I don't have my well-worn "DNS and BIND" book with me right now but I
am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:08:30PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> DNS-SD using unicast DNS seems reasonable to me too.
>
>If we can do without the avahi gunk, and use it in a way that is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:45:28AM -0400, p...@laptop.org wrote:
>benjamin m. schwartz wrote:
> > Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > > The short of it is that mdns/dns-sd make sense for a small,
> > > underutilised network of peers. They assume that the netwo
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:05 AM, wrote:
> my initial reaction to this is that it's going to look to the client exactly
> the same as a bad guy trying to poison DNS by sending unasked for responses,
> how do the clients tell the difference?
They can't. That's how DNS works. Lots of ink have flowe
martin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:05 AM, wrote:
>
> > also note that this will require that you run some sort of
> > DNS cache on the
>
> The standard dns resolver libs on linux (part of glibc?) caches
> alright. All platforms I know cache things alright, and it's fairly
> serio
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:05 AM, wrote:
>> my initial reaction to this is that it's going to look to the client exactly
>> the same as a bad guy trying to poison DNS by sending unasked for responses,
>> how do the clients tell the difference?
>
> The
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:46 AM, wrote:
> I believe this is exactly what has been done over the last few years in the
> DNS server/DNS cache software. they used to accept extra responses like you
> are trying to make, but nowdays they don't.
As everyone pointed out, I was wrong about plain clien
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:46 AM, wrote:
>> I believe this is exactly what has been done over the last few years in the
>> DNS server/DNS cache software. they used to accept extra responses like you
>> are trying to make, but nowdays they don't.
>
> A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:26:30AM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
>Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> The short of it is that mdns/dns-sd make sense for a small,
>> underutilised network of peers. They assume that the network is a
>> cheap resource, that
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Here's my understanding:
I've read the damned specs, don't worry. I need help getting sh*t done
because there's a lot of stuff to do.
any takers?
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask in
Martin Langhoff writes:
(sorry if you receive this email twice; I've had a network glitch
while sending it for the first time and I'm not sure it has gone through)
>> also note that this will require that you run some sort of DNS cache on the
>
> The standard dns resolver libs on linux (part
Martin Langhoff writes:
>> also note that this will require that you run some sort of DNS cache on the
>
> The standard dns resolver libs on linux (part of glibc?) caches
> alright. All platforms I know cache things alright, and it's fairly
> serious bug if your OS doesn't.
I'm afraid that's not
2009/4/22 Iñaki Arenaza :
> I'm afraid that's not always true. Running Debian Lenny here without
Paul, Iñaki, -- you guys are right.
It also means that there's no point worrying about pushing extra
records in the DNS responses.
> I've used tcpdump to dump DNS traffic while running 'ping -n
I bo
>> I'm afraid that's not always true. Running Debian Lenny here without
>
> Paul, Iñaki, -- you guys are right.
>
> It also means that there's no point worrying about pushing extra
> records in the DNS responses.
It won't affect the XS side of things, but from the XO client side of
things the new
18 matches
Mail list logo
