On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:01, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 11:50 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> For past stable releases, deployers are the ones who should know best.
>> If you are talking about 0.82, then we should go back to use
>> simplejson. If this is 0.84 on F11, then we can u
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 11:50 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> For past stable releases, deployers are the ones who should know best.
> If you are talking about 0.82, then we should go back to use
> simplejson. If this is 0.84 on F11, then we can use what python 2.6
> provides.
0.82 doesn't have this bu
2009/11/12 Lucian Branescu :
> The json module (simplejson) has only the parser written in C, so it's
> still slower overall than cjson. Not by a lot, but measurable.
Well, we don't really care about overall slowness, but only if it's
fast enough for our actual use of it. In this case, we only car
I did a quick and not-so-scientific benchmark. The test involves a
round trip for a small json file 10 times.
cjson7.56759595871
simplejson-c 9.09944200516
simplejson-pure 58.1605060101
2009/11/13 Daniel Drake :
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:53 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:53 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> After a few tries, I did find that the same problem was reported in
> Debian, a patch proposed, and upstream rejected it:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534709
>
> As Tomeu mentions, Python 2.6 reduces the cjson/json p
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> It would be worth a quick look at fixing cjson yourself.
I am cheeky but I am not a C hacker. Looking around yesterday, I have
not found a way to report bugs against cjson. The "project homepage"
is the page of the company where the author w
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:14 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > Right now just using the json module in python 2.6 may be best as the
> > parser is a C module (AFAIR).
> >
> > Is because of a bug in cjson why those files aren't being parsed?
>
The json module (simplejson) has only the parser written in C, so it's
still slower overall than cjson. Not by a lot, but measurable.
2009/11/12 Martin Langhoff :
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> Then maybe yes, I am seeing a bug in cjson that parses 'foo\/bar'
>> i
