Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote: The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would like to replicate the results. I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some results with our builds. git clone

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-07 Thread Sebastian Silva
On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote: The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would like to replicate the results. I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some results with our builds. Thanks a lot for your detailed tests! Sebastian

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-07 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:32:00PM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote: On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote: The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would like to replicate the results. I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some results with our

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-03 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
SHC8420412 = 332S On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:54 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: With Sugar 0.98 in 13.2.1, the XO-1 was so short of memory that adding swap gave an obvious benefit. Thanks to those who have verified this for us. With Sugar 0.104 in 13.2.4, things seem much better

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-03 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Activity startup time is much reduced, and reduced still further when the pulsing icon animation is switched from 10 times a second to twice a second. The animation is stealing resources! On the other hand, the spinning cursor during startup or in Browse consumes no significant resources.