-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:33 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and
XO-1
To: fors...@ozonline.com.au
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:35 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Some XO
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps in an effort to optimize the
ubifs file system and reduce the footprint of the install, some important
component necessary to boot has been omitted?
No changes were planned or expected on the ubifs front -- can
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:33 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and
XO-1
To: fors
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps in an effort to optimize the
ubifs file system and reduce the footprint of the install, some important
component necessary to
I dont have an XO-1 with me, but I presume if it's ubifs, the files will
also be the same (i.e. os1.onu and os1.uim), adn one will use the
update-nand ofw command, instead of the jffs2 copy-nand command. But, I'm
presuming that. Will let you know tonight.
KG
No joy on the XO-1 install.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
It booted with a transient black screen, brings up the little arrow, then
goes to sugar arrow and boots into the sugar home screen, but has a little
black square on the screen in the bottom left corner.
Filed as #11407 -
Some XO-1's can't handle ubifs
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11094
Is there any chance this is related?
Tony
I dont have an XO-1 with me, but I presume if it's ubifs, the files will
also be the same (i.e. os1.onu and os1.uim), adn one will use the
update-nand ofw command, instead of
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote:
Excellent! Thanks for this!
I am pretty worried with the removal of gnome fallback -- I can't see
sw rendering being usable on XO-1, and probably
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote:
Excellent! Thanks for this!
I am pretty worried with the removal of gnome
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, its coming to F17 as a feature, as I said previously, that
doesn't mean that Fallback mode is going away in F17.
There's nothing in that discussion thread about keeping a knob to
enable fallback mode. The title of
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote:
There's nothing in that discussion thread about keeping a knob to
enable fallback mode. The title of the thread says it all.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome_shell_software_rendering
states clearly that the
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome_shell_software_rendering
states clearly that the fallback knob will still exist
You are right. Thanks. I had just reacted to Ajax's email, and the
thread that follows.
Unfortunate
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, its coming to F17 as a feature, as I said previously, that
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, its coming to F17 as a feature, as I said previously, that
2011/11/7 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
Thanks, it was about what I expected. We're about 3-4 months out from
the spit and polish side of things, more aimed at developers to get a
platform with systemd and all the libraries/tools needed for the port
to gtk3 etc.
Testing if activities
2011/11/7 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org:
2011/11/7 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
Thanks, it was about what I expected. We're about 3-4 months out from
the spit and polish side of things, more aimed at developers to get a
platform with systemd and all the libraries/tools needed for
El día 7 de noviembre de 2011 16:38, Peter Robinson
pbrobin...@gmail.com escribió:
2011/11/7 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org:
2011/11/7 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
Thanks, it was about what I expected. We're about 3-4 months out from
the spit and polish side of things, more aimed at
17 matches
Mail list logo
