Just to chime in, as has been already noted the max file size on a FAT32
system is 4GB. Some of the files we deal with are much larger than that.
Ex. the Zim files for TED talks etc. are 8GB+ in size. Now we could always
break them into smaller chunks, but that is another step.
--
Anish
On Mon,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:24:23PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote:
> On balance, SD Card industry standard exFAT seems (to me) more
> future-proof for a hassle-free "grassroots content" partition over
> coming years,
> [...]
If you're able to control the desktops and laptops that will be used
to add or re
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:57 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> LFN (long filename) support is present in all the operating systems
> you've mentioned, and works fine with FAT32.
>
Thanks for the correction. FAT32 is indeed about as universal/tolerable of
a standard as possible in 2015. But might not
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 09:12:34PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote:
> Towards this quite universal demand, an exFAT partition seems much
> better than FAT32, as exFAT works with most all recent Windows and
> Mac machines, without filename limitations. (Not unrelated to exFAT
> being the modern SD Card indu
A "Custom_Content" folder is eventually demanded by almost every IIAB-like
deployment.
The reason is that every local school / librarian quite naturally wants a
Non-Bureaucratic process, to add their own language/videos/curriculum,
copying their own file-tree onto the SD card, using their own Wind