John Gilmore wrote:
I prefer "the Sugar learning platform"
>
> And my laundress prefers "fabric revitalization consultant".
>
> Sugar isn't about learning. Sugar is a user interface. It draws
> icons and decorations on the screen, starts and stops programs, and
> lets you turn
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:05 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I prefer "the Sugar learning platform"
>
> And my laundress prefers "fabric revitalization consultant".
>
> Sugar isn't about learning. Sugar is a user interface. It draws
I find your first statement wholly contestable
> >> I prefer "the Sugar learning platform"
And my laundress prefers "fabric revitalization consultant".
Sugar isn't about learning. Sugar is a user interface. It draws
icons and decorations on the screen, starts and stops programs, and
lets you turn control knobs. The things Sugar competes wi
I prefer platform since I think the platform is a key element in the
overall environment.
-walter
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:11 PM, David Farning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is also a Sugar Labs branding issue. Sugar Learning Platform does a
> better job of conveying we are not a stand alon
This is also a Sugar Labs branding issue. Sugar Learning Platform does a
better job of conveying we are not a stand alone solution. We are a common
point of collaboration on which educators and developers build solutions for
their own unique classrooms and situations.
thanks
david
On Wed, Oct 8
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I prefer "the Sugar learning platform"
>
> +1 from me as well. (I'm torn on "platform" vs. "environment"; the
> latter actually sounds a little frie
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer "the Sugar learning platform"
+1 from me as well. (I'm torn on "platform" vs. "environment"; the
latter actually sounds a little friendlier, to me.)
- Eben
> -walter
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Tomeu Viz
Not yet... if someone wants to make a pdf from that page, this would
rock. Something to discuss on Friday. As for window manager v.
learning platform... an updated [[Glossary]] isn't a bad idea.
SJ
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is the
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer "the Sugar learning platform"
+1
Marco
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
I prefer "the Sugar learning platform"
-walter
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Samuel Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> The laptops feature the latest release of the Sugar window manager, ...
>
> I think we should be
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 23:49, Samuel Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The laptops feature the latest release of the Sugar window manager, running
> on a Linux-based Fedora Core operating system. For answers to frequently
> asked questions, and for other XO giving programs, see the OLPC wiki.
Ju
Tomeu Vizoso schrieb:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Samuel Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The laptops feature the latest release of the Sugar window manager, ...
>>
>
> I think we should be able to find a better term than "window manager",
> Matchbox is the window manager used i
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Samuel Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The laptops feature the latest release of the Sugar window manager, ...
I think we should be able to find a better term than "window manager",
Matchbox is the window manager used in 8.2 and it hasn't been modified
by OLPC
is there anything like a poster/flyer in high resolution PDF?
p.
Samuel Klein wrote:
> This year's G1G1 program will start November 17 in the US. Please
> help us spread the word. Below is a short email blurb about this
> year's program ( from [[G1G1 2008/text]] ). We are coordinating some
> c
14 matches
Mail list logo
