On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you can't just share a file, you have to share an activity, ...
Right.
Idea for a new activity: Candy Bag. You open a bag (i.e. you launch the
CandyBag activity), then you put journal
Great idea... Robson had a similar one. SJ
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
John Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you can't just share a file, you have to share an activity, ...
Right.
Idea for a new activity: Candy Bag. You open a bag (i.e. you
John Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you can't just share a file, you have to share an activity, ...
Right.
Idea for a new activity: Candy Bag. You open a bag (i.e. you launch the
CandyBag activity), then you put journal entries in it, then sharing
this activity means that your friends
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 06:27:59PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
2) Sugar would run more smoothly on-XO if jhbuild were retired.
I think this is a good point in the abstract. Do any frequent contributors
*not* have an XO?
I approve of retiring jhbuild, and handing out XO's to Sugar
I don't think anyone would argue that we need better tools for
software development on the XO. There has been a latent Develop
activity in the works that occasionally gets a boost from the
community (want to jump in?). I would argue that a bigger stumbling
block than problems with Sugar and
instead of just turtle programs and gooey smalltalk...
Cannot let this one slip by uncommented on. Etoys is one place where
kids are doing real programming, as a means of achieving fluency about
many powerful ideas, not just syntax. But I unaware that children have
made contributions to Squeak
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 06:27:59PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
[some interesting points]
Sorry my meta-comments snuck in - they aren't relevant, and I didn't
follow my own advice...I retract them (I'm sure you can tell what
parts they were).
= Do any frequent contributors have ONLY an XO? =
