On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 05:16:31PM -0500, Kevin Gordon wrote:
> Well, as much as it would be fun to throw Mr. Holt under the bus on
> this, I must do the mea culpa. :-) I volunteered to lend Tim and
> him a slew of XO-1's to do AP testing, but I asked for him to
> confirm that if I had to roll bac
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:25 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:04:52AM -0500, Kevin Gordon wrote:
> > Thanks for this detailed update. If i may summarize, if one is
> > using a 12 or 13 O/S on any architecture, I'm assuming the
> > recommended f/w is the most current, wheth
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:04:52AM -0500, Kevin Gordon wrote:
> Thanks for this detailed update. If i may summarize, if one is
> using a 12 or 13 O/S on any architecture, I'm assuming the
> recommended f/w is the most current, whether on XO-1, 1.5, 1.75 or
> 4. If running 11, well, one is on th
From: Adam HoltSent: Friday, February 7, 2014 20:12To: Devel's in the DetailsSubject: Fwd: [support-gang] is rolling back firmware dangerous? (on XO-1s especially)From: James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org>Date: Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:17 PMSubject: Re: [support-gang] is rolling ba
From: James Cameron
Date: Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: [support-gang] is rolling back firmware dangerous? (on XO-1s
especially)
To: "Community Support Volunteers -- who help respond to \"help AT
laptop.org\""
Cc: Adam Holt , support-g...@laptop.org
On Fri, Feb 07
