On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:56 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The way it's done right now is to copy mime information to ~/.local at
> > installation time.
>
> I know. I personally don't like r
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The way it's done right now is to copy mime information to ~/.local at
> installation time.
I know. I personally don't like requiring an "installation step", and
I think it might be easier to keep the random bits o
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:45 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps we could also investigate the use of the xdg utilities for
> > managing mimetype associations and installing activities?
>
> Good poi
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apart from the window manager stuff - something I will probably be
> working on is support for standard .desktop files - which are used to
> generate the main menu entries in standard desktops. Any .desktop file
> inst
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:37 AM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to present a few areas where sugar can "play nice with
> others", including:
> * replacing the matchbox window manager, to provide better
> multiple-window support for legacy apps (think of the 'gimp', running
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps we could also investigate the use of the xdg utilities for
> managing mimetype associations and installing activities?
Good point. I've talked with sugar folk about this some already. My
Journal2 code is going to
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
>
> Perhaps we could also investigate the use of the xdg utilities for
> managing mimetype associations and installing activities?
Sugar already uses the xdg mime spec. I'm not sure to which utilities you
are referring exa
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 03:07:58PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> I'd like to present a few areas where sugar can "play nice with
> others", including:
> * replacing the matchbox window manager, to provide better
> multiple-window support for legacy apps (think of the 'gimp', running
> as multip
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:23 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> can we stop referring to anything non-sugary as a "legacy" app.
>>
>> i'd submit that we all use dozens of such apps every day, most
>> of which are i
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:23 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can we stop referring to anything non-sugary as a "legacy" app.
>
> i'd submit that we all use dozens of such apps every day, most
> of which are in no danger of going away anytime soon. :-)
I'm using "standard desktop applications"
can we stop referring to anything non-sugary as a "legacy" app.
i'd submit that we all use dozens of such apps every day, most
of which are in no danger of going away anytime soon. :-)
how about referring to them as "existing X11 apps".
paul
c. scott ananian wrote:
> I'd like to present a few
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:07 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * making sugar behave well when run in non-full-screen-mode under
> metacity. This includes refactoring home/friends/mesh view as
> operations on root window, so they make sense in a multiwindow setup.
> (It's been su
I'd like to present a few areas where sugar can "play nice with
others", including:
* replacing the matchbox window manager, to provide better
multiple-window support for legacy apps (think of the 'gimp', running
as multiple windows without one full-screen "activity area" aka
"virtual desktop")
*
13 matches
Mail list logo
