Dave Belfer-Shevett wrote:
> Do I simply use the sugar-control-panel -s jabber j1.olpc.stonekeep.com
> or the like to point the XO's to my server? And they'll come up as
> active / neighborhood users?
Yes. (If not, the jabber server's probably not configured correctly.)
Regards
Morgan
___
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 at 22:01:03 -0700, drew einhorn wrote:
> If we are going to have small local communities instead of one big one,
> the we need to be able to contact multiple jabber servers
The underlying protocol of the server-based collaboration is XMPP. In
XMPP, you never need to connect to
On Jan 6, 2008 2:24 PM, Kent Loobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 06 January 2008 12:46:42 Edward Cherlin wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2008 9:01 PM, drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In fact, I think we need a Social Networking Web site specifically for
> > the children, protected from a
On Sunday 06 January 2008 12:46:42 Edward Cherlin wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 9:01 PM, drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact, I think we need a Social Networking Web site specifically for
> the children, protected from adults who might want to interfere or
> exploit children. And a site for
On Jan 5, 2008 9:01 PM, drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we are going to have small local communities instead of one big one,
> the we need to be able to contact multiple jabber servers, because there
> will be communities organized by:
>
>age groups
>language
>xo activity
>
If we are going to have small local communities instead of one big one,
the we need to be able to contact multiple jabber servers, because there
will be communities organized by:
age groups
language
xo activity
geographic region
curriculum topic
and many more
the chances that al
Dave Belfer-Shevett wrote:
> I've just received my, er, my son's XO, and he's ecstatic with it,
> enjoying fiddling with Python programs and other tidbits. I've heard
> that the Jabber 'chat' functions are disabled on the US XO's, mostly
> because the existing jabber hosts can't really take th
Walter Bender wrote:
> While we have ideas about how to scale up the jabber interface, it has
> also always been the idea that local communities (schools,
> neighborhoods), communities of interest (book clubs, chess clubs)
> etc., would run their own servers. The more the merrier at this stage.
> W
While we have ideas about how to scale up the jabber interface, it has
also always been the idea that local communities (schools,
neighborhoods), communities of interest (book clubs, chess clubs)
etc., would run their own servers. The more the merrier at this stage.
We probably need a better forum
I've just received my, er, my son's XO, and he's ecstatic with it,
enjoying fiddling with Python programs and other tidbits. I've heard
that the Jabber 'chat' functions are disabled on the US XO's, mostly
because the existing jabber hosts can't really take the load of all
these machines going
10 matches
Mail list logo
