On 28 June 2010 14:52, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is os203 (sorry! Should have mentioned it -- )
>
> Ooh, thanks for noticing that. In that case, I can look farther back
> in the history and decide to blame:
>
> http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-os-builder/commit/?id=fb74bbaf81fe2
Hi,
> This is os203 (sorry! Should have mentioned it -- )
Ooh, thanks for noticing that. In that case, I can look farther back
in the history and decide to blame:
http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-os-builder/commit/?id=fb74bbaf81fe2d095fbadefaea218fdb740e93f2
Dan, did you intend not t
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> It's unexpected, and an odd bug because nothing changed in the build
> scripts between os203 and os204. I'm going to run another build and
> keep an eye out for any error messages..
This is os203 (sorry! Should have mentioned it -- )
m
--
Hi Martin,
> Hi list, just now, attempting to test dsd's Record-82, I realized
> that all preinstalled activities in /home/olpc/Activities are
> owned by root.root, with modes 755/644 .
>
> Installation from Browse fails. Our activity updater fails as
> well.
>
> Is this
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> just now, attempting to test dsd's Record-82, I realized that all
> preinstalled activities in /home/olpc/Activities are owned by
> root.root, with modes 755/644 .
>
> Installation from Browse fails. Our activity updater fails
Hi list,
just now, attempting to test dsd's Record-82, I realized that all
preinstalled activities in /home/olpc/Activities are owned by
root.root, with modes 755/644 .
Installation from Browse fails. Our activity updater fails as well.
Is this expected -- part of an overall change that needs to
