On 06.12.2008, at 17:49, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Add Fedora logo to Sugar
>
> This is, I think, a misunderstanding.
Yes it is. I set reply-to to OLPC-devel, this does not concern Suagr.
> Kim says "Sugar is supposed to
> include a fedora lo
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:45, Sebastian Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > Hm... we could have a link in the "about my XO" section that opens up a
> page
> > in browse that describes all the components that make up the starch
> stack.
> Sure, only I'm pretty sure this is not what RedHat had in mi
2008/12/6 Luke Faraone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> To put it succinctly, actually, fedora is a distribution of GNU+Linux,
>> a free operating system. Specifically, out of GNU+Linux, the "Linux"
>> bit represents less than 1%.
>
> This is more of a religious war as well as a matter of preference; RH ha
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:37, Simon Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:18:39 -0500
> "Sebastian Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was surprised that our main UI metaphor - a CHILD, the center of
> > activities... a Symbol for Interacting and Sharing... would be
> > res
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:26, Sebastian Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> 2008/12/6 Luke Faraone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:05, Sebastian Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > wrote:
> > Uh, why?
> >
> > It is, after all, a installation of RedHat's _Fedora_ OS (albiet with
> OLP
