greg wrote:
> I know that downgrade is hard. The great thing is that the XO supports
> that very elegantly right now!
>
> I don't want to lose that.
>
> It saved me once when I upgraded to joyride image without a developer
> key (doh!) and was locked out.
but don't confuse "saving yours
Hi Paul,
Sorry about the subject screw up. That's twice in two days :-(
I know that downgrade is hard. The great thing is that the XO supports
that very elegantly right now!
I don't want to lose that.
It saved me once when I upgraded to joyride image without a developer
key (doh!) and was loc
re we ship 8.2.0.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg S
>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:25:17 +1200
> > From: "Martin Langhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Code name for 9.1.0
> > To: "Morgan Collett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:35:55AM -0700, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> Am 15.07.2008 um 05:19 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> morgan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:56, Richard A. Smith
> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Morgan Collett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With olpc-update, it's not critical to update from version x to
> version x+1 - we can skip versions as we don't depend on a particular
> package state. (e.g. You can upgrade from 650 to joyride without
> having to upgrade
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> appropriating apricots
Alliterating Apricots
m
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wik
On Jul 16, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> We've gone from build numbers, to ship.x, to update.x
Nonsense. The ship.x and update.x were part of the same scheme, and
that was a _tagging_ scheme, not a naming scheme. It served merely to
correlate a certain piece of production and deployme
Greg S
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:28:59 -0400
> From: Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Code name for 9.1.0
> To: "Jameson \"Chema\" Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Me
Absence of dissent does not mean agreement. It often means some people
are just tired of the topic and will find the topic frustrating to chime
in on; I know this to be true for some of us.
I must say I'm tired of us changing our naming scheme again and again.
We've gone from build numbers, to s
Well, actually, the mango suggestion was made originally as a tree, not a
fruit - as the tree Freire learned to read underneath. Obviously the concept
of "learning under a tree" exists in many cultures around the world, and
there are several trees that would work for this:
apple (newton),
bodhi/ba
p-pom for short. heh. =)
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:30 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eben wrote:
> > This is clever. - Eben
>
> but we need to keep at least one half of the name to one or two
> syllables though. i'm not looking forward to having to IRC about
> "pummeling pomegranates".
>
> p
eben wrote:
> This is clever. - Eben
but we need to keep at least one half of the name to one or two
syllables though. i'm not looking forward to having to IRC about
"pummeling pomegranates".
paul
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'v
This is clever. - Eben
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've always been an alliteration fan, but how about a noun and a
> verb--after all, learning is action.
>
> appropriate apricots
>
> or a gerund form
>
> appropriating apricots
>
> -walter
>
>
> On
Am 15.07.2008 um 07:10 schrieb Richard A. Smith:
> Morgan Collett wrote:
>
>>> Heh. I never noticed. Why do you think the alphabetical ordering
>>> is so
>>> special?
>>
>> It's easy to know the upgrade path: dapper -> edgy -> feisty -> gutsy
>> -> hardy -> intrepid -> j
>
> I thought tha
Morgan Collett wrote:
>> Heh. I never noticed. Why do you think the alphabetical ordering is so
>> special?
>
> It's easy to know the upgrade path: dapper -> edgy -> feisty -> gutsy
> -> hardy -> intrepid -> j
I thought thats what the release number was for? The code name is just
that a
I've always been an alliteration fan, but how about a noun and a
verb--after all, learning is action.
appropriate apricots
or a gerund form
appropriating apricots
-walter
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 15.07.2008 um 05:19 schrieb Tomeu Vizo
Am 15.07.2008 um 05:19 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> morgan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:56, Richard A. Smith
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
> Ideas so far. Please vote or propose a new one:
>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 14:34, Richard A. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> i have to say, though, that one of the best decisions ubuntu
>> ever made was to have alphabetically ordered codenames. i'm
>
> Heh. I never noticed. Why do you think the alphabetical order
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i have to say, though, that one of the best decisions ubuntu
> ever made was to have alphabetically ordered codenames. i'm
Heh. I never noticed. Why do you think the alphabetical ordering is so
special?
--
Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One Laptop Per Child
__
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> morgan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:56, Richard A. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Greg Smith wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ideas so far. Please vote or propose a new one:
> > >> Freire
> > >> mango
> > >> Papert
> > >
>
morgan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:56, Richard A. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greg Smith wrote:
> >
> >> Ideas so far. Please vote or propose a new one:
> >> Freire
> >> mango
> >> Papert
> >
> > I'm +1 for mango. I think naming after fruits plays well with calling
> > ou
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:56, Richard A. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>
>> Ideas so far. Please vote or propose a new one:
>> Freire
>> mango
>> Papert
>
> I'm +1 for mango. I think naming after fruits plays well with calling
> our user environment sugar.
Another +1 for ma
Greg Smith wrote:
> Ideas so far. Please vote or propose a new one:
> Freire
> mango
> Papert
I'm +1 for mango. I think naming after fruits plays well with calling
our user environment sugar.
--
Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One Laptop Per Child
___
Hi Guys,
I believe Freire is pronounced "fr eh ee ray".
I thought this list was the "community" you were referring to. Let me
know exactly what e-mail lists or wiki pages or whatever you want for
communication strategy.
Good point from James about Freire being political which may be a problem.
>
> So, that said, starting with Freire might still allow us to move in a
> different direction for 9.2 and avoid the learning philosophy wars.
> --scott
I could easily propose my "trees" idea as a follow up to Freire. He spoke of
learning to write with a stick in the dirt under a mango tree. 9.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Jameson Chema Quinn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we do choose this naming scheme, I think Freire is a good place to start.
> If not, I think that something suggesting growth (names of trees?) might be
> safer.
As I understand it, the other part of the Fedora nam
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:40 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > My suggestion is to use names of famous pedagogues as code names. I
> > suggest we call this one Freire for Paulo Freire
> > (http://en.wikipe
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My suggestion is to use names of famous pedagogues as code names. I
> suggest we call this one Freire for Paulo Freire
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Freire)
>
> Any other votes or code name suggestions?
Well, I'm not
Hi All,
I need to create a page where I can start organizing ideas and gathering
requirements for 9.1.0.
I plan to refer to it by code name instead of number until its released
(thanks to Scott for the suggestion).
My suggestion is to use names of famous pedagogues as code names. I
suggest we
29 matches
Mail list logo
