On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:21:00PM +0200, NoiseEHC wrote:
> Erik, you asked how long would it take to finish my decompression
> routines. I did not answer since I was not sure but now it is 100% that
> it will no go into 8.2.0 (currently I am working 12+ hours and could not
> switch on my XO
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:51:08PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:06:03PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, A
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:06:03PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:41:38AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> >> In most cas
The best would be writing with LZO and later recompress with ZLIB. Also
the clear install image (which is created in the build) should use the
slowest ZLIB compression, but I am not sure if this latest idea worths
implementing.
Erik, you asked how long would it take to finish my decompression
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:06:03PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:41:38AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> In most cases, the files that activities put into the DS are moved
> >> instead of copied,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:41:38AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> In most cases, the files that activities put into the DS are moved
>> instead of copied, because of the long time that takes writing to
>> jffs2 due to compre
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:41:38AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> In most cases, the files that activities put into the DS are moved
> instead of copied, because of the long time that takes writing to
> jffs2 due to compression. That will change the profiling results a
> lot.
I'm working on the jffs
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:09 AM, riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:41 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> < ... >
>> It is updating the "what" combobox in the toolbar, see
>> SearchToolbar.refresh_filters().
>>
>> This of course could be optimized in the same way that the lis
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:41 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
< ... >
> It is updating the "what" combobox in the toolbar, see
> SearchToolbar.refresh_filters().
>
> This of course could be optimized in the same way that the list view
> update is, by only refreshing once the journal comes visible again.
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 12:18 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:10 PM, riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:41 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 3:30 PM, riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > + Sysprof statistics:
> >> > htt
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:10 PM, riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:41 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 3:30 PM, riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> > Testcase:
>> > Fill the datastore with `many small' objects.
>>
>> Which user
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:41 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 3:30 PM, riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Testcase:
> > Fill the datastore with `many small' objects.
>
> Which user-perceived action are you investigating?
I thought the datastore is one of the
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 3:30 PM, riccardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Testcase:
> Fill the datastore with `many small' objects.
Which user-perceived action are you investigating?
> The test was automated with the script at:
> http://dev.laptop.org/~rlucchese/datastore_fill/fill_ds
Why
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 15:30 +0200, riccardo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Testcase:
> Fill the datastore with `many small' objects.
>
> Build: 2266
< ... >
>
>
> + Sysprof statistics:
> http://dev.laptop.org/~rlucchese/datastore_fill/small_files__b2000.sysprof
>
> I can't see anything relevant fo
Hi,
Testcase:
Fill the datastore with `many small' objects.
Build: 2266
The test was automated with the script at:
http://dev.laptop.org/~rlucchese/datastore_fill/fill_ds
For this test only the _TEST_SMALL_FILES flag was set in `fill_ds' and
the following cmdline was used:
$ fill_ds -s sourc
15 matches
Mail list logo