> Hi Richard,
>
> Waooo 71K Does a big deployment is coming ?
Nope. Its for an existing deployment.
> I can wait. It's not urgent for this one.
> BTW I will probably ask you for others (some XO on our Nosy Komba
> deployment) later in the month.
Sure. Happy to help. Just send me a file of
>> I?ve got the message: ?Your developer key will be ready in 0 minutes.
>> Please check back later.?
>
> You are behind a 71k laptop lease generation request. Which looks like it
still has another 40 hours to go before it finishes. If you absolutely
gotta have it now > the
On 04/03/2013 03:37 PM, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any issue with the Activation Service?
I asked a developer key for a XO-1 about 72h ago and I can’t retrieve
the key.
I’ve got the message: “Your developer key will be ready in 0 minutes.
Please check back later.”
You
Hi all,
Is there any issue with the Activation Service?
I asked a developer key for a XO-1 about 72h ago and I cant retrieve the
key.
Ive got the message: Your developer key will be ready in 0 minutes. Please
check back later.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best regards from
On 15 March 2011 11:01, Ed McNierney wrote:
> Sridhar -
>
> Yes, that's correct. Multiple valid keys weakens security, since the same
> rights can be obtained from multiple sources.
>
> Handling your own key-issuing authority is something we fully support, but it
> is a complex and substantial
4, 2011, at 7:46 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> On 14 March 2011 10:58, James Cameron wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 03:46:02PM +1100, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
>>> There are three main questions raised by this process:
>>> [...]
>>> 3. why must I wait
On 14 March 2011 10:58, James Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 03:46:02PM +1100, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
>> There are three main questions raised by this process:
>> [...]
>> 3. why must I wait 24 hours to get the developer key?
>
> Presuming you are ask
hen contents of your
>>> develop.sig might help; your developer key might be malformed or
>>> correspond to a different XO than the one you are trying to use it on.
>>>
>>> You can also try the collection key method, as one more check on the
>>> process by which y
wrote:
> On 12 March 2011 05:10, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>> Posting your machine's serial number as well as then contents of your
>> develop.sig might help; your developer key might be malformed or
>> correspond to a different XO than the one you are trying to use it on.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 03:46:02PM +1100, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> There are three main questions raised by this process:
> [...]
> 3. why must I wait 24 hours to get the developer key?
Presuming you are asking about an OLPC developer key rather than a
deployment developer ke
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 02:36 -0500, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> >> why am I getting different readings for each method?
> >
> > My guess is that file /home/.devkey.html was copied in from some other
> > system, and shows the serial number and
On 12 March 2011 18:36, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
>>> why am I getting different readings for each method?
>>
>> My guess is that file /home/.devkey.html was copied in from some other
>> system, and shows the serial number and UUID of the co
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
>> why am I getting different readings for each method?
>
> My guess is that file /home/.devkey.html was copied in from some other
> system, and shows the serial number and UUID of the copied-from system.
It would be interesting to investiga
> why am I getting different readings for each method?
My guess is that file /home/.devkey.html was copied in from some other
system, and shows the serial number and UUID of the copied-from system.
And there is a mis-match between the bottom cover and the motherboard.
Since the boot process does
On 12 March 2011 05:10, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Posting your machine's serial number as well as then contents of your
> develop.sig might help; your developer key might be malformed or
> correspond to a different XO than the one you are trying to use it on.
>
> You can als
Posting your machine's serial number as well as then contents of your
develop.sig might help; your developer key might be malformed or
correspond to a different XO than the one you are trying to use it on.
You can also try the collection key method, as one more check on the
process by whic
I am trying to put a permanent developer key on an XO-1. I have been
following the steps at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activation_and_developer_keys
First, I created the key using devkey.html. Then I copied develop.sig
to /security on the XO. After rebooting, I still see a wp tag in
/ofw/mfg-data
Forwarded conversation
Subject: Internal Server Error
From: *Pavel Stržínek*
Date: 2010/9/11
To: csc...@laptop.org
Hello Scott
I'm trying to apply for a developer key for OLPC v1 from Browser
activity right on XO device but I'm getting Internal Server Err
Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> On 2 XOs I tested, running 767, whenever I go to the request developer
> key page in the browse activity, the SUBMIT button has vertical
> stripes of randomly colored pixels running across 'em.
You should have searched Trac for "stripe" or
> I disagree about it not affecting things. if you don't know what the button
> is supposed to say it can really hurt (although it _is_ the only button on
> the page, so if it said nothing you could assume that people are going to
> push it anyway.
Well, it's still readable (you can read the text
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> Hey all.
>
> On 2 XOs I tested, running 767, whenever I go to the request developer
> key page in the browse activity, the SUBMIT button has vertical
> stripes of randomly colored pixels running across 'em.
>
> It's no b
gt; On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
>
>> Hey all.
>>
>> On 2 XOs I tested, running 767, whenever I go to the request developer
>> key page in the browse activity, the SUBMIT button has vertical
>> stripes of randomly colored pixels running a
I did.
Tiago Marques
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> Hey all.
>
> On 2 XOs I tested, running 767, whenever I go to the request developer
> key page in the browse activity, the SUBMIT button has vertical
> stripes of randomly colored pixels
Hey all.
On 2 XOs I tested, running 767, whenever I go to the request developer
key page in the browse activity, the SUBMIT button has vertical
stripes of randomly colored pixels running across 'em.
It's no biggie and really doesn't affect things, but a little annoying
nonethele
Hey all.
On 2 XOs I tested, running 767, whenever I go to the request developer
key page in the browse activity, the SUBMIT button has vertical
stripes of randomly colored pixels running across 'em.
It's no biggie and really doesn't affect things, but a little annoying
nonethele
Yes. That page was there, but was broken during a recent site update. A
bug¹s been opened with our Web team and it will be fixed shortly.
- Ed
On 12/2/08 9:16 PM, "Bobby Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that's exactly the point. We currently offer developer keys by
> postal mail for users who do not have Internet access, but users
> without Internet access cannot get the instructions on how to make
> such a request.
must get a developer key
and do not have access to the internet at all, you can submit a
written request via snail mail to:
One Laptop per Child
P.O. Box 425087
Cambridge, MA 02142
Your key will be mailed back to you.
We are obligated to provide access to developer keys to children who
have
Ed McNierney wrote:
> No, all I'm thinking about is having .devkey.html contain the postal
> instructions in the HTML local to the machine, so it can be read by
> someone without Internet access at all. Someone can launch the Browse
> activity, click on "get a develo
No, all I'm thinking about is having .devkey.html contain the postal
instructions in the HTML local to the machine, so it can be read by
someone without Internet access at all. Someone can launch the Browse
activity, click on "get a developer key", and read the instructi
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that's exactly the point. We currently offer developer keys by postal
> mail for users who do not have Internet access, but users without Internet
> access cannot get the instructions on how to make such a request. The
Yes, that's exactly the point. We currently offer developer keys by
postal mail for users who do not have Internet access, but users
without Internet access cannot get the instructions on how to make
such a request. The "Getting Started" pamphlet refers users to
www.laptop.org/source
fo
Hi,
> Yes. For example, we can add information about postal-mail
> requests to the page, without opening up the 767 build.
I think Ed's point is that someone who wants to take advantage of a
postal-mail request necessarily can't talk to activation.l.o. :)
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <[EMA
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> > Folks - I'm investigating steps that can make it easier to get
> > developer keys for XOs for users who desire them. At the moment
> > the developer key reques
Hi Ed,
> Folks - I'm investigating steps that can make it easier to get
> developer keys for XOs for users who desire them. At the moment
> the developer key request page at file:///home/.devkey.html
> contains content that is retrieved (in an
Folks -
I'm investigating steps that can make it easier to get developer keys
for XOs for users who desire them. At the moment the developer key
request page at file:///home/.devkey.html contains content that is
retrieved (in an IFRAME) from the activation.laptop.org server (as
we
y: Unsupported scheme
> ..FINISHED
> downloaded: 0 bytes in 0 files"
>
>
> 2008/4/18, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 17.04.2008, at 15:56, Daly Ikbel wrote:
> hello,
>
> I sent a request to get a developer key for my XO (OLPC)
> I received
CTED]>:
> On 17.04.2008, at 15:56, Daly Ikbel wrote:
> hello,
>
> I sent a request to get a developer key for my XO (OLPC)
> I received the accept but I can't download it with the command
> "wget -p / security http://activation...";
> listed in the response of the r
On 17.04.2008, at 15:56, Daly Ikbel wrote:
> hello,
>
> I sent a request to get a developer key for my XO (OLPC)
> I received the accept but I can't download it with the command
> "wget -p / security http://activation...";
> listed in the response of the requ
hello,
I sent a request to get a developer key for my XO (OLPC)
I received the accept but I can't download it with the command
"wget -p / security http://activation..."; <http://activation...%22%c2%a0/>
listed in the response of the request.
Please what ca
On Feb 11, 2008 11:16 PM, Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:04 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> > I emailed Ivan this morning to try to get a
> > recent Quanta dump so that I can sort this out.
>
> I don't have that e-mail. I have a question from you not mentioning a
> du
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 10:11 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6377
>
> I added code for this exact case this morning after seeing the failure
> in the logs. (Django emails you whenever it fails with a server
> erro
Oh, its because I had to type it in manually; I didn't have
working wireless as the local network uses WPA and the shipped
software version didn't support it.
(And trying to do upgrades to any image fails the crypto check,
but thats a different story for later.)
Can you delete the entry so I can
On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:04 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> I emailed Ivan this morning to try to get a
> recent Quanta dump so that I can sort this out.
I don't have that e-mail. I have a question from you not mentioning a
dump from 4:29PM, is that what you mean?
> I assumed I would have a regular
On Feb 11, 2008 10:11 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6377
I added code for this exact case this morning after seeing the failure
in the logs. (Django emails you whenever it fails with a server
error.) Future attempts will state clearly that the problem i
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Chris Ball wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I signed up for a developer key, so I have one now. But what can I
>>> do with it?
>>
>> You can do anything that you'd expect to do with a standard laptop;
Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I signed up for a developer key, so I have one now. But what can I
>> do with it?
>
> You can do anything that you'd expect to do with a standard laptop;
> install any operating system, and flash a new BIOS.
>
>
Hi,
> I signed up for a developer key, so I have one now. But what can I
> do with it?
You can do anything that you'd expect to do with a standard laptop;
install any operating system, and flash a new BIOS.
> How can I be sure I'm not going to nuke the XO
I signed up for a developer key, so I have one now. But what can I do
with it? How can I be sure I'm not going to nuke the XO beyond all
recovery? Is there some kind of documentation on what's risky and what's
safe?
___
Devel mai
49 matches
Mail list logo
