We're still grappling with the aftermath of http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10402
XO-1.5s that have been damaged from overheating are being replaced,
but we also need a means to prevent others from meeting a similar
fate.
Our preferred solution is to upgrade to our latest build, which has a
fixed po
hi sridhar -- i'll take a stab at more detailed answers to all of
these questions tomorrow.. powerd was developed initially on machines
that had ohmd installed (i think the rpm still tries to uninstall
ohmd first) so it's probably not far from working. but it's entirely
possible (likely) that som
Does ohm wake on lid open? It's been so long ...
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On 24 May 2011 14:42, Paul Fox wrote:
> hi sridhar -- i'll take a stab at more detailed answers to all of
> these questions tomorrow.. powerd was developed initially on machines
> that had ohmd installed (i think the rpm still tries to uninstall
> ohmd first) so it's probably not far from working
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> There is still a danger of these XOs overheating, so we are looking to
> develop a solution that is as painless and quick to deploy as
> possible.
Is a 'hardware solution' more feasible? ie: find a way to ensure they
don't stack the XOs
On 24 May 2011 22:53, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
> wrote:
>> There is still a danger of these XOs overheating, so we are looking to
>> develop a solution that is as painless and quick to deploy as
>> possible.
>
> Is a 'hardware solution' more fea
sridhar wrote:
> On 24 May 2011 14:42, Paul Fox wrote:
> > hi sridhar -- i'll take a stab at more detailed answers to all of
> > these questions tomorrow.. powerd was developed initially on machines
> > that had ohmd installed (i think the rpm still tries to uninstall
> > ohmd first) so it's
sridhar wrote:
> We're still grappling with the aftermath of
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10402
>
> XO-1.5s that have been damaged from overheating are being replaced,
> but we also need a means to prevent others from meeting a similar
> fate.
>
> Our preferred solution is to upgrade t
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> as you've gathered, there are a lot of pieces that make all this
> work: the UI, powerd, the kernel, the firmware. if you could upgrade
> all of the last three, you might be fine, but of course then other
> interactions between your user-level a
james wrote:
> Does ohm wake on lid open? It's been so long ...
yes. i think it can't help it, as there's no way to suppress
lid-open wakeups on older kernels.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.
On 24 May 2011 23:42, Paul Fox wrote:
> i think james cameron has better data, since he did the testing,
> but i seem to recall that XO-1 doesn't overheat to the same extent
> that you discovered with 1.5. (unless you have more evidence
> in that regard.) if we were convinced that was true (and
On 25 May 2011 12:45, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> On 24 May 2011 23:42, Paul Fox wrote:
>> i think james cameron has better data, since he did the testing,
>> but i seem to recall that XO-1 doesn't overheat to the same extent
>> that you discovered with 1.5. (unless you have more evidence
>> in
sridhar wrote:
> On 25 May 2011 12:45, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> > On 24 May 2011 23:42, Paul Fox wrote:
> >> i think james cameron has better data, since he did the testing,
> >> but i seem to recall that XO-1 doesn't overheat to the same extent
> >> that you discovered with 1.5. (unless
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:37:05PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
> certainly not as serious as with XO-1.5:
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10402#comment:5
>
> what's not clear is a) whether this condition can be caused by
> lid-switch, and b) whether it can be caused in your charging
> racks. from m
On 05/24/2011 11:37 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> certainly not as serious as with XO-1.5:
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10402#comment:5
>
> what's not clear is a) whether this condition can be caused by
> lid-switch, and b) whether it can be caused in your charging
> racks. from my experience with
smith wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 11:37 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > certainly not as serious as with XO-1.5:
> > http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10402#comment:5
> >
> > what's not clear is a) whether this condition can be caused by
> > lid-switch, and b) whether it can be caused in your charging
On 05/25/2011 01:20 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> > Its the other way around. The original problem was reported by people
> > using the racks. We just theorized that people who stack them would
> > also have a similar problem.
>
> yes. but quozl's test of xo-1 laptops, as reported in the above
17 matches
Mail list logo
