Continuing on the tradition of "Keep confusion, yet again" thread
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023440.html
I was yesterday in a conf call with the Perú team, who had been
working with teachers and were reporting a "keep" bug on F11/S0.84
images.
What was very clear wa
El Wed, 23-06-2010 a las 16:49 -0400, Martin Langhoff escribió:
> So here we have two separate bugs:
>
> B1 - That we have a "Keep" button, labelled "Keep", that actually
> creates a new document but retains the same document name.
We solved this by relabeling the button to "Keep a copy".
> B2
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:49:48PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> B1 - That we have a "Keep" button, labelled "Keep", that actually
> creates a new document but retains the same document name.
I don't like it.
> B2 - What you can see between steps #2.1 and #2.2 -- if you wait a few
> seconds bet
On 23 June 2010 15:49, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Continuing on the tradition of "Keep confusion, yet again" thread
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023440.html
>
> I was yesterday in a conf call with the Perú team, who had been
> working with teachers and were reporting a
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 06:07:46PM -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Here in Peru they are modifying all of the 30 activities on the laptop
> to remove the Keep button.
Those modifications will have general interest from other deployments.
Can they be published?
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.or
On 24 Jun 2010, at 00:07, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 23 June 2010 15:49, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Continuing on the tradition of "Keep confusion, yet again" thread
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023440.html
>>
>> I was yesterday in a conf call with the Perú team, wh
On 06/24/2010 01:07 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 23 June 2010 15:49, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Continuing on the tradition of "Keep confusion, yet again" thread
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023440.html
>>
>> I was yesterday in a conf call with the Perú team, who had
On 06/23/2010 10:49 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
[...]
> It probably needs to be complemented by an option in the Journal to
> add a "duplicate this document", and Home View changes to make it
> clearer/easier to open a new activity without reopening the last
> document.
We actually did a lot of wor
> After making tests [1] in deployments for "start new"
> vs. "resume" we concluded that the way activity starting works on the
> iPhone would probably work well in Sugar, too [2].
>
Hehe, this is exactly the thing you would get with per-activity
datastores. Guess what, Android does this to
On 24 Jun 2010, at 09:45, NoiseEHC wrote:
>
>> After making tests [1] in deployments for "start new"
>> vs. "resume" we concluded that the way activity starting works on the
>> iPhone would probably work well in Sugar, too [2].
>>
>
> Hehe, this is exactly the thing you would get with per-ac
>
>
> A "duplicate document" function in the journal would be very useful, I
> think.
>
> I think it's easier and more correct implement this in the activities.
> --
> // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
> \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
>
> ___
11 matches
Mail list logo
