On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 21:08 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On Oct 16 2008, at 21:11, Jeremy Katz was caught saying:
> > On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 20:18 -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> > > Now that the Joyride floodgates are open, which kernel branch do you
> > > recommend we start testing in Joyride for the
On Oct 16 2008, at 20:18, Chris Ball was caught saying:
> Hi Deepak/Andres,
>
> Now that the Joyride floodgates are open, which kernel branch do you
> recommend we start testing in Joyride for the 9.1 release? If the
> master branch, are there any regressions in it compared to the testing
> branc
On Oct 16 2008, at 21:11, Jeremy Katz was caught saying:
> On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 20:18 -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> > Now that the Joyride floodgates are open, which kernel branch do you
> > recommend we start testing in Joyride for the 9.1 release? If the
> > master branch, are there any regression
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 20:18 -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> Now that the Joyride floodgates are open, which kernel branch do you
> recommend we start testing in Joyride for the 9.1 release? If the
> master branch, are there any regressions in it compared to the testing
> branch? Which of 2.6.2[567] sh
Hi Deepak/Andres,
Now that the Joyride floodgates are open, which kernel branch do you
recommend we start testing in Joyride for the 9.1 release? If the
master branch, are there any regressions in it compared to the testing
branch? Which of 2.6.2[567] should we aim to ship with 9.1?
Thanks,
-
