On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> | On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |> We will have an open discussion of how to build a framework that will
> ease the
> |> creation
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a very interesting perspective. I will definitely think hard
> about that and try to come up with a sensible comparison.
>
> Offhand, I think the Collisionless idea is like a design where each
> person's
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
| On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> We will have an open discussion of how to build a framework that will
ease the
|> creation of reliable collaborative activities. I will also outline a
proposal
|> for "Collisionless",
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We will have an open discussion of how to build a framework that will ease
> the
> creation of reliable collaborative activities. I will also outline a
> proposal
> for "Collisionless", a particular message-bas
Title: Frameworks for simultaneous and sequential collaboration
Abstract:
The OLPC sharing design encompasses two rough classes of sharing. In the
simultaneous case, a number of students join a shared Activity and all edit a
document together in real time. In the sequential case, students make l
