On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:26 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:58:37PM -0700, S Page wrote:
>> olpc-update still said `sudo olpc-update 10.1.2_xo1-851` , I assume
>> that's a typo and changed it and the .usb links to 852.
>
> I've usually avoided changing that until I've tested
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:58:37PM -0700, S Page wrote:
> olpc-update still said `sudo olpc-update 10.1.2_xo1-851` , I assume
> that's a typo and changed it and the .usb links to 852.
I've usually avoided changing that until I've tested it, as part of my
role as system test coordinator. Occasiona
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:34:17PM -0700, S Page wrote:
> ... updating XO-1s from 8.2.0 , please reply or comment if
> you're having this problem or not. It seems important enough for the
> release notes.
What is the population of laptops that might be updated from 8.2.1 to
10.1.2 instead of fres
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:58 PM, S Page wrote:
> == Activity groups ==
> I notice there's a new activity group,
> url=http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1Lite
> I think this was in os851 as well, but I'm pretty sure that either
> olpc-update to os851 or the Software update control panel gave
Hi,
> In the deployments there are complaints about accidentally
> deleting Activities in Gnome. Can we use the ".hidden" file in
> Nautilus too hide it? Doing echo "Activities" > .hidden in
> /home/olpc/ the directory is invisible in Nautilus.
Yes, you can do that.
I'm reluctant t
On 08/25/2010 11:59 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> There are other directory we can hide /home/olpc/power-logs.
If you want this hidden then you have to hide it yourself. Its where it
is and visible intentionally.
--
Richard A. Smith
One Laptop per Child
_
In the deployments there are complaints about accidentally deleting
Activities in Gnome.
Can we use the ".hidden" file in Nautilus too hide it?
Doing
echo "Activities" > .hidden
in /home/olpc/ the directory is invisible in Nautilus.
There are other directory we can hide /home/olpc/power-logs.
Gon
Hi,
> On my XO-1 after olpc-update --usb to os851 and then network
> olpc-update to os852, I notice almost all my system files are
> dated 2007-11-02 according to `ls -l`.
This is intentional, to speed up future olpc-updates. Don't worry
about it.
I suppose we could bump it¹ up to a n
On my XO-1 after olpc-update --usb to os851 and then network
olpc-update to os852, I notice almost all my system files are dated
2007-11-02 according to `ls -l`. Things like
* /usr/bin/*
* /etc/olpc-release
* /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31xol-blah (but not the /boot/vmlinuz symlink)
* /versions/sticky, many
> Just updated my XO-1.5 to 852 and I now have the battery show up twice in
> the frame...
I didn't notice this on my XO-1 after olpc-update --usb from 802 to
os851, and not in my network olpc-update from os851 to os852.
--
=S
___
Devel mailing list
Dev
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/10.1.2
>
> http://build.laptop.org/10.1.2/xo-1.5/os852
> http://build.laptop.org/10.1.2/xo-1/os852
olpc-update still said `sudo olpc-update 10.1.2_xo1-851` , I assume
that's a typo and changed it and the
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Christoph Derndorfer <
christoph.derndor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just updated my XO-1.5 to 852 and I now have the battery show up twice in
> the frame...
>
> Anyone else seeing this?
>
Odd, after two more shutdown / boot cycles we're now back to one battery
icon in
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/10.1.2
>
> http://build.laptop.org/10.1.2/xo-1.5/os852
> http://build.laptop.org/10.1.2/xo-1/os852
>
> Compressed image size: 604.25mb (+1.50mb since build 851)
>
> This build will become the 10.1.2 rele
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/10.1.2
http://build.laptop.org/10.1.2/xo-1.5/os852
http://build.laptop.org/10.1.2/xo-1/os852
Compressed image size: 604.25mb (+1.50mb since build 851)
This build will become the 10.1.2 release after final testing, we hope.
Changelog:
* bootfw, #9100: New
14 matches
Mail list logo
