OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-14 Thread Peter Robinson
Just thought I'd post my understanding of where the packages are at based on the list that was created at FUDCon For reference see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC/Packages_for_F11 Also there's the OLPCDelta tracking bug in RHBZ 462625 for quick tracking of the ones I'm aware of. KOJI package

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-14 Thread Peter Robinson
> Just thought I'd post my understanding of where the packages are at > based on the list that was created at FUDCon > > For reference see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC/Packages_for_F11 > > Also there's the OLPCDelta tracking bug in RHBZ 462625 for quick > tracking of the ones I'm aware of. >

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:31, Peter Robinson wrote: > > sugar-evince - Probably need to get evince split into evince-libs and > evince so that sugar-evince can build against evince-libs. Not sure if > there's plans to get sugar-evince upstreamed for easy maintenance Yesterday was working in upst

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:15, Peter Robinson wrote: > > - xulrunner and the OLPC patches (currently using mainline Fedora > package) - Mario & Simon I have seen that in trunk the native theme can be enabled and disabled in runtime, so that would be one patch less. I'm not 100% sure it got into 1

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Peter Robinson
>> sugar-evince - Probably need to get evince split into evince-libs and >> evince so that sugar-evince can build against evince-libs. Not sure if >> there's plans to get sugar-evince upstreamed for easy maintenance > > Yesterday was working in upstreaming our patches. I really really hope > that w

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:15, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> - xulrunner and the OLPC patches (currently using mainline Fedora >> package) - Mario & Simon > > I have seen that in trunk the native theme can be enabled and disabled > in runtime,

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> sugar-evince - Probably need to get evince split into evince-libs and >>> evince so that sugar-evince can build against evince-libs. Not sure if >>> there's plans to get sugar-evince upstreamed for easy maintenance >> >> Yesterday was wor

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:16, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:15, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> >>> - xulrunner and the OLPC patches (currently using mainline Fedora >>> package) - Mario & Simon >> >> I have seen that in tr

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-15 Thread Peter Robinson
- xulrunner and the OLPC patches (currently using mainline Fedora package) - Mario & Simon >>> >>> I have seen that in trunk the native theme can be enabled and disabled >>> in runtime, so that would be one patch less. I'm not 100% sure it got >>> into 1.9.1, though. >> >> Do you know if

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-16 Thread Bobby Powers
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Just thought I'd post my understanding of where the packages are at > based on the list that was created at FUDCon > > For reference see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC/Packages_for_F11 > > Also there's the OLPCDelta tracking bug in RHB

Re: OLPC vs Fedora packages

2009-01-16 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 14:25 -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Just thought I'd post my understanding of where the packages are at > > based on the list that was created at FUDCon > > > > For reference see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC/Pa