Re: Status of SVG rendering on the XO

2007-12-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Dec 21, 2007 4:49 PM, Ed Trager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A question to ask might be, when will the XO get updated to use FF3's new rendering engine? The new engine is supposed to be faster, although I have not found that to really be the case on our machines. We are currently using the

Re: Status of SVG rendering on the XO

2007-12-23 Thread Jake B
Is the Browse activity using a stable version of XULRunner? If so, how are you able to use the stable release of XULRunner, and still use firefox 3 beta 1's rendering engine? Please let me know. Thanks. Jake On Dec 23, 2007 8:56 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 21, 2007

Re: Status of SVG rendering on the XO

2007-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
We ship xulrunner on the builds, I'm not sure what kind of performance we get out of SVG right now, though. Marco On Dec 20, 2007 9:06 PM, Jake B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, I am expecting to get my XO laptop in the mail any day now. I was hoping someone could tell me, does the XO

Re: Status of SVG rendering on the XO

2007-12-20 Thread Eben Eliason
I've seen some examples of this working, though none of them complex enough to really test performance. The core problem when I used it was that the coordinate system for the mouse events didn't map correctly to the display, due to the browsers scaling algorithm. I'm not sure in what timeframe

Re: Status of SVG rendering on the XO

2007-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Dec 20, 2007 9:30 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've seen some examples of this working, though none of them complex enough to really test performance. The core problem when I used it was that the coordinate system for the mouse events didn't map correctly to the display, due to

Re: Status of SVG rendering on the XO

2007-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Dec 20, 2007 9:31 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 20, 2007 9:30 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've seen some examples of this working, though none of them complex enough to really test performance. The core problem when I used it was that the

Re: Status of SVG rendering on the XO

2007-12-20 Thread Eben Eliason
On Dec 20, 2007 3:31 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 20, 2007 9:30 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've seen some examples of this working, though none of them complex enough to really test performance. The core problem when I used it was that the

Re: Status of SVG rendering on the XO

2007-12-20 Thread Jake B
Just to make sure I understand, do you still have problems even after using the functions built into SVG for translating from screen coordinates to user coordinates? http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/coords.html#NestedTransformations http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/types.html Using getScreenCTM and such