Re: c preprocessor.

2008-05-15 Thread Albert Cahalan
This is good, not bad. Adding glibc-headers is the proper response. The XO is really really close to having normal and standard tools for software development. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: c preprocessor.

2008-05-15 Thread Neil Graham
On Friday 16 May 2008 6:06:10 pm Martin Langhoff wrote: > What happens if we remove it? Well, it looks like Ubuntu tried, and > had to revert It looks like they just removed the dependency rather than a replacement. xrdb supports -cpp filename preprocessor to use [/usr/bin/cpp] so a sm

Re: c preprocessor.

2008-05-15 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is the only package that requires cpp. Next question - why does > xorg-x11-server-utils require cpp? According to the changelog * Mon Nov 28 2005 Mike A. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.99.2-6 - Added "Requires: cpp" as xr

Re: c preprocessor.

2008-05-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 04:57:40PM +1200, Neil Graham wrote: > I noticed today that my xo (newly 703) has cpp which while modest in size > seems to launch /usr/libexec/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/cc1 which weighs in > at 5.1Meg rpm -q --whatrequires /usr/bin/cpp rpm -qf /usr/bin/cpp