On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 05:46:33PM -0500, Tim Moody wrote:
> However, just to be clear, if I build from
> /usr/share/doc/olpc-os-builder-5.0.2/examples/olpc-os-12.1.0-xo1.ini,
> will the image be identical to the release, regardless of build
> number?
Yes, if every file downloaded to your builder
, regardless of build number?
Tim
-Original Message-
From: James Cameron
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 5:16 PM
To: Tim Moody
Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org
Subject: Re: olpc os builder
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:54:14PM -0500, Tim Moody wrote:
I created an fc17-32 vm and installed olpc-os
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:54:14PM -0500, Tim Moody wrote:
> I created an fc17-32 vm and installed olpc-os-builder.
>
> When I run olpc-os-builder
> /usr/share/doc/olpc-os-builder-5.0.2/examples/olpc-os-12.1.0-xo1.ini
> I get 21003xx0.img, etc., which does not seem to be the latest
> build. I was
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:53:42PM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:48 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> > Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes;
> > one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be
> > used offline. This is what I
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:48 PM, James Cameron wrote:
>> Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes;
>> one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be
>> used offline. This is what I did for mk
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:48 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes;
> one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be
> used offline. This is what I did for mktinycorexo.
Try the --cache-only option.
Daniel
_
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:48 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:44:09PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > > Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:44:09PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now
> > > getting this traceback when trying
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now
> > getting this traceback when trying to run OOB:
>
> No, olpc-os-builder has worked fine when I tried it
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now
> getting this traceback when trying to run OOB:
No, olpc-os-builder has worked fine when I tried it this morning on a
similar build.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.l
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Maybe it looks a bit odd, but I think it is the best option, because
> it retains consistency, makes documentation/training simpler, and will
> reduce confusion.
A bit of DWIM won't hurt ;-)
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> You can also do
>
>> [base]
>> [xo1]
>
> but it looks really dorky.
Maybe it looks a bit odd, but I think it is the best option, because
it retains consistency, makes documentation/training simpler, and will
reduce confusion.
On Mar 2, 2012 6:21 PM, "Daniel Drake" wrote:
> I propose that we simplify this: remove the "global.modules" variable,
> and make the presence of a section become the hint that a module is
> loaded. For example:
Yes please. It's a common mistake to forget to add the module in the
modules list.
S
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
> Thoughts/objections?
I'm not an OOB user so I will abstatin, but it sounds like a nice
simplification and I am interested to hear from actual OOB users.
cjl
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.lapt
+1
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:18 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Changes the hard coded loop device numbers to numbers that are
> discovered using losetup itself.
Pushed, thanks
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On 14 October 2010 16:58, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> We have 4 local languages that are not in Sugar nor Linux/Fedora
> localizations. The plan so far is to start working on Sugar's Pootle
> for Sugar and Activities. The timeframes don't allow for a full cycle
> upstream (not even glibc knows about
Thanks, I will take a look and in last case create a patch for the file. I
just though it was a strange behavior. I commented the line in
preimage.90.core.sh and everything build fine. Later I ran the optimization on
the XO itself and everything ran fine.
more later,
juliano
On 06/1
On 6 October 2010 20:35, Juliano Bittencourt wrote:
>
> I've been helping Hellanio to get his build with kdelibs and koffice. I
> hit awkward error in preimage.90.core.sh
>
> After some investigation I isolated the error when olpc-os-build compile
> the python bytecode
>
> /usr/lib/pyth
I've been helping Hellanio to get his build with kdelibs and koffice. I
hit awkward error in preimage.90.core.sh
After some investigation I isolated the error when olpc-os-build compile
the python bytecode
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/nose/proxy.py:93: SyntaxWarning: assertion i
Had something to do with the size of the generated image? which limit the
image size?
Where it stated that (can I change?) as informed before, I can use up to
800MB of memory. If I install all these packages already installed in a
notebook the pure system then the right, is soon to be large.
alread
On 3 October 2010 16:48, Hellânio Costa wrote:
> # also removed some packages in Gnome
no need to modify the code, you can use custom_packages to remove them
> ERROR:root:Error creating Live CD : fsck returned an error!
> ERROR: Failure in BuildStage: module base, part build.40.imagecreate.py,
On 29 September 2010 20:20, Hellânio Costa wrote:
> Now I'm worried because even just leaving a package in custom_packages error
> persists.
No, thats a different error.
I think you'd have to post more of the output to make sense of it.
Daniel
___
Deve
Now I'm worried because even just leaving a package in custom_packages error
persists.
---
os48: * FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *
os48: 33487/49152 files (1.6% non-contiguous), 177284/177284 blocks
/usr/lib/python
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Reuben K. Caron wrote:
> Isn't a pre-requisite to also remove root?
Removing root is a way to make it stronger / harder to workaround.
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't g
Martin,
Isn't a pre-requisite to also remove root? Alternatively have you
considered rebuilding initrd signed with ARG keys to check and readd
the config on every reboot if it has been removed?
Regards,
Reuben
On Sep 28, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Working recently in La Ri
I did not add anything more and it worked, so the error is in the extra
packages that I'm wanting.
I'll try one by one then ... =(
2010/9/27 Daniel Drake
> On 27 September 2010 20:04, Hellânio Costa
> wrote:
> > Did with custom_packages and even then the error is the same one has any
> > idea
On 27 September 2010 20:04, Hellânio Costa wrote:
> Did with custom_packages and even then the error is the same one has any
> idea which package is giving this error?
Have you confirmed that the error does not occur if you make a build
without any customizations?
Daniel
Did with custom_packages and even then the error is the same one has any
idea which package is giving this error?
2010/9/24 Daniel Drake
> On 24 September 2010 14:12, Hellânio Costa
> wrote:
> > ok,
> > need to install the koffice-suite on the laptop besides some
> applications,
> > you see:
>
On 24 September 2010 14:12, Hellânio Costa wrote:
> ok,
> need to install the koffice-suite on the laptop besides some applications,
> you see:
> I edited for convenience only "kspkglist.50.gnome.inc"
You should use the custom_packages module and avoid modifying
olpc-os-builder code to add new pa
ok,
need to install the koffice-suite on the laptop besides some applications,
you see:
I edited for convenience only "kspkglist.50.gnome.inc"
# --- OLPC / UFCeará BRAZIL
#
# gnome desktop
gnome-python2-gconf
gnome-desktop
gnome-panel
On 24 September 2010 13:01, Hellânio Costa wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm having a problem when working with them olpc-builder, because it returns
> the following error:
>
> os19: 71283/131072 files (0.9% non-contiguous), 386289/524288 blocks
> * Running part mountfs base mountfs.50.mount.sh...
>
Are you executing osbuilder.py using sudo? If you're using sudo
olpc-os-builder have a problem when it executes chroot.
You must to try using root user.
cheers.
2010/9/24 Hellânio Costa
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm having a problem when working with them olpc-builder, because it
> returns the foll
yes I am logged in as root
Fedora 11 without updates.
So I do not understand why this is giving error! : (
I may be generating a very large image and then the error?
2010/9/24 James Cameron
>
> I presume this would read Permission denied.
--
Instituto UFC - Virtual
www.virtual.ufc.br
__
Are you running it as root?
On 24/09/2010, at 10:01 PM, Hellânio Costa wrote:
> Normalize file times...
> touch: configurando horário de "/var/tmp/olpc-os-builder/mnt-fs/dev/fd":
> Permissão negada
I presume this would read Permission denied.
Are you running it on Fedora 11?
The repo config that start with "olpc_public_rpms_" is downloaded from
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos. This configuration is hardcoded in
modules/repos/ksmain.50.repos.py
If you want to change it, you should change the line that contains
url = "http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/%s";
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:39:21AM +0430, javed khan wrote:
> now i have some question
> I want to create local repository, so which files i should download from
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/
> there are three folders
> f11
> f11-xo1.5
> f11-xo1
> there are tons of files there.
> now what
Hi,
There's no need to clone repos... when you use image builder or os
builder it will download only the required packages.
You can also put a proxy cache in between the build script and the
Internet (set the http_proxy variable) to make sure that when you go
to run the build again nothing will
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Had an interesting question from Sebastian M here in La Rioja...
>
> The .iso output of olpc-os-builder (and published on build.laptop.org)
> -- is it useful? Can it be run in emulation? Has anyone tried?
Is it easy to build with an extra (va
I also fixed a small issue in the configuration where public_rpm
packages were not overriding F11 updates...be sure to double-check the
list of package changes in the next build.
Daniel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.or
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:25:13PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 07:24 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:45:10AM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > > Thanks, but I'm not so sure about getting users to run "make install"
> > > since that will put things in /
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 07:24 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:45:10AM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Thanks, but I'm not so sure about getting users to run "make install"
> > since that will put things in /usr rather than /usr/local.
>
> "make" apparently does nothing, and t
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:45:10AM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Thanks, but I'm not so sure about getting users to run "make install"
> since that will put things in /usr rather than /usr/local.
"make" apparently does nothing, and the README at the time said to use
the "olpc-os-builder" command, s
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 13:50 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> Tested olpc-os-builder on Fedora 11, and documented the steps required
> to produce a build in a Quick Start section of the README.
Thanks, but I'm not so sure about getting users to run "make install"
since that will put things in /usr rat
44 matches
Mail list logo
