I have tested for firefox only. For both firefox-2 and firefox-3 it works
well. I have used my own svg file so I dont get any problem regarding icon.
Its really easy to make it work. I have tried to make the xo bundle from
those stuffs . The steps I did was
1)Sugarize the firefox
2) Copy entire
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What happens when you try to make activities full screen in metacity
>> (by setting the appropriate ICCCM/EWMH hints) looks like
>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What happens when you try to make activities full screen in metacity
> (by setting the appropriate ICCCM/EWMH hints) looks like
> http://dev.laptop.org/~sayamindu/sugar_metacity/Captura%20de%20pantalla_1.png
>
> If y
2008/6/27 Carol Lerche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> dia folk are working on a feature that allows either the gimp style (SDI) or
> the windows style (MDI). Don't know when it will be released. Gimp is
> available via the "gimpshop" fork as an MDI application. Does this help?
Yeah. And I think it's ye
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Jim Gettys <[
dia folk are working on a feature that allows either the gimp style (SDI) or
the windows style (MDI). Don't know when it will be released. Gimp is
available via the "gimpshop" fork as an MDI application. Does this help?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wro
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Jim Gettys <[
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 11:19 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti w
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 11:19 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>>
>>> There are ways we can implement different behavior for different
>>> win
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 11:19 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>
>> There are ways we can implement different behavior for different
>> windows (for example the maximus approach could be extended to do so).
>> The problem is,
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 11:19 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> There are ways we can implement different behavior for different
> windows (for example the maximus approach could be extended to do so).
> The problem is, how do we know which windows should be displayed
> fullscreen (say the firefo
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> There are ways we can implement different behavior for different
>> windows (for example the maximus approach could be extended to do so).
>> The problem is, how do we know which windows should be displayed
>> fullscreen (s
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> GNOME Calculator did not break in sugar when I ran it in maximized +
>> undecorated mode. Gimp did though.
>
> Breaks as it looks real
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GNOME Calculator did not break in sugar when I ran it in maximized +
> undecorated mode. Gimp did though.
Breaks as it looks really ugly (huge buttons). I guess that's
something you could fix upstream though...
Marco
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From what I gathered from my experiments, I think it makes sense for
>> us to go with Metacity + maximus. That would require no code c
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:12 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking for the che
> There are ways we can implement different behavior for different
> windows (for example the maximus approach could be extended to do so).
> The problem is, how do we know which windows should be displayed
> fullscreen (say the firefox or the gedit one) and which not (the
> gimp)? afaik there is
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> | On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> |> Can't regular activities just ask to be maximized
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
| On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> Can't regular activities just ask to be maximized
|> and/or ask to be the same size as the screen?
|> The common Python libraries could do this.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:12 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm looking for the cheap wins first ;-)
>>>
>>> when people talk about different desktops, doesn't this also i
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:12 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> this wouldn't require changing any code on any apps, just selecting the
>>> right window manager for that desktop (if th
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:12 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm looking for the cheap wins first ;-)
>>
>> when people talk about different desktops, doesn't this also imply different
>> window managers for each one? if this is the case, then
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:12 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> this wouldn't require changing any code on any apps, just selecting the
>> right window manager for that desktop (if the app never opens secondary
>> windows it doesn't need any decorations, if it does
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:12 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for the cheap wins first ;-)
>
> when people talk about different desktops, doesn't this also imply different
> window managers for each one? if this is the case, then it should be fairly
> simple to define a window manager
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:38 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
From what I gathered from my expe
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:38 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From what I gathered from my experiments, I think it makes sense for
>>> us to go with Meta
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:15 AM, surendra sedhai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tested for firefox only. For both firefox-2 and firefox-3 it works
> well. I have used my own svg file so I dont get any problem regarding icon.
> Its really easy to make it work. I have tried to make the xo bundl
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From what I gathered from my experiments, I think it makes sense for
>> us to go with Metacity + maximus. That would require no code changes
>> in metacity and minor
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From what I gathered from my experiments, I think it makes sense for
>> us to go with Metacity + maximus. That would require no code chang
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I gathered from my experiments, I think it makes sense for
> us to go with Metacity + maximus. That would require no code changes
> in metacity and minor changes in sugar. If we want to support activity
> ico
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I gathered from my experiments, I think it makes sense for
> us to go with Metacity + maximus. That would require no code changes
> in metacity and minor changes in sugar. If we want to support activity
> ic
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Other than the circle icon, do you have any ma
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Other than the circle icon, do you have any major issue? If it's just
> that, adding _NET_WM_ICON support to the sugar shell should be really
> easy.
I'm not sure... Surendra has been working on it.
Added him to cc in case he has comments.
> I'm planning to work on
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Other than the circle icon, do you have any major issue? If it's just
>> that, adding _NET_WM_ICON support to the sugar shell should
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other than the circle icon, do you have any major issue? If it's just
> that, adding _NET_WM_ICON support to the sugar shell should be really
> easy.
Great.
BTW, the old-style bitmaps could be given the XO colors
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Oh, is there a way around this requirement too? A few days ago
>> someone here at OLE Nepal bundled up Firefox 2 and was disappointed
>> to get the infamous circle icon. For them, changing the code and
>> rebuilding f
Am 26.06.2008 um 05:12 schrieb Bernie Innocenti:
> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>>> If we manage to make DBus entirely optional, the initial effort
>>> of porting a Linux applications to Sugar would be greatly
>>> simplified.
>>
>> As far as I know this is already the case. The only non standard bi
37 matches
Mail list logo
