On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:27 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> For you, given our conversation last night, I think this option (play
> until break) is probably the best. You will naturally play with things
> that others might not. That will be good value. Duplication isn't
> necessarily a bad thing.
W
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:53:12PM -0800, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> All seems to be working fine with the expected bugs (no camera yet).
> Now I just need someone to tell me what I should test. I don't want
> to just duplicate what has already been done.
>
> Should I just "play" until something "bre
; support-g...@lists.laptop.org
> From: w...@laptop.org
> Subject: Re: Secure or Unsecure?
> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:29:02 -0500
> To: c...@laptop.org
>
>
> Chris,
> She probably has a machine with OS31 on it. I doubt
> olpc-update will work until she upgrad
Chris,
She probably has a machine with OS31 on it. I doubt
olpc-update will work until she upgrades via OFW first.
wad
On Dec 6, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Caryl,
>
>> First, I don't know how to tell if the machine is secured or not.
>
> It's definitely unsecured.
>
>> As a
On 12/06/2009 05:03 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> If you're talking about a command that starts with "flash", that's for
> the firmware, and not for the booted XO.
>
> To upgrade both firmware and software at the same time, open the
> terminal activity, go online, and type:
>
> sudo su -
> olpc-update f1
Hi Caryl,
> First, I don't know how to tell if the machine is secured or not.
It's definitely unsecured.
> As a "developer" machine it should be unsecured, but the firmware
> version doesn't show up on the start-up banner. As a matter of
> fact, there is no start-up banner, leading m
Hi,
I am playing with the XO-1.5 that Adam sent this week. I love a lot of the
features, but want to get updated so I can help test things. I have printed
out the instructions for updating and have run into a few snags.
First, I don't know how to tell if the machine is secured or not. As a
On 12/06/2009 01:15 AM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> First, I don't know how to tell if the machine is secured or not. As a
> "developer" machine it should be unsecured, but the firmware version
> doesn't show up on the start-up banner.
> As a matter of fact, there is no
> start-up banner, leading me to
